Wireless Device Transmit Power Control for Tolling Interference

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for coexistence between automatic tolling stations and intelligent traffic systems in Europe fail to adequately suppress interference, as the existing dynamic maximum power reduction (D-MPR) only modifies the lower limit of maximum configured transmit power, leaving the upper limit unchanged, leading to high interference levels.

Innovation Solution

A transmit power determining method that adjusts the maximum transmit power of a wireless communications device based on distance and frequency differences with another device, setting the transmit power to a preset threshold to suppress interference, using formulas to calculate the adjusted power considering various power losses and reductions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Power

If the upper limit of maximum configured transmit power is not modified, then the device can maintain higher transmit power for better communication performance, but interference to tolling stations increases and coexistence requirements are not met

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransmit powerVSAvoidinterference to tolling station
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent modifies the upper limit parameter of maximum configured transmit power by introducing a new parameter P_CMAX (absolute maximum transmit power) that is always less than or equal to the existing P_EMAX. This parameter change ensures that even when P_EMAX is high, the actual transmit power is capped at P_CMAX, which is calculated to meet ETSI coexistence requirements and prevent interference to tolling stations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Object-affected harmful factors

If the maximum transmit power is reduced to meet coexistence requirements, then interference to tolling stations is suppressed, but communication performance and coverage area deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinterference to tolling stationVSAvoidtransmit power
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSPower

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces dynamic power adjustment mechanisms where P_CMAX is not a fixed value but is determined based on multiple factors including frequency band, distance to tolling station, and environmental conditions. The device dynamically calculates and adjusts P_CMAX to achieve the minimum power level required to meet coexistence requirements while maintaining adequate communication performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Ease of manufacture

If only the lower limit of maximum configured transmit power is modified, then implementation is simple, but coexistence requirements are not adequately met and interference remains high

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimplementation simplicityVSAvoidinterference to tolling station
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the power control mechanism into two distinct layers: P_EMAX (configured maximum power) and P_CMAX (absolute maximum power). This segmentation allows the system to maintain the existing P_EMAX configuration for backward compatibility while introducing P_CMAX as an additional constraint layer that specifically addresses coexistence requirements, making the implementation modular and manageable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentEP3554150B1Method for determining transmit power, and wireless communication device
Publication Date: 2022.03.09 HUAWEI TECH CO LTD
  • EP3554150B1 patent drawingFigure 1~3
  • EP3554150B1 patent drawingFigure 4~5
  • EP3554150B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Embodiments of the present invention disclose a transmit power determining method. The method in the embodiments of the present invention includes: determining, by a first wireless communications device, a distance between the first wireless communications device and a second wireless communications device; determining, by the first wireless communications device, a working frequency of the second wireless communications device; and when the first wireless communications device determines that a first condition is met, if the first wireless communications device determines that a maximum transmit power corresponding to the first wireless communications device is greater than a preset threshold, adjusting the maximum transmit power, so that the adjusted maximum transmit power is equal to or less than the preset threshold, where the preset threshold is used to suppress, under the first condition, interference caused by the first wireless communications device to receiving performance of the second wireless communications device, where the first condition includes that the distance is less than or equal to a first threshold, and a difference between a working frequency of the first wireless communications device and the working frequency of the second wireless communications device is less than or equal to a second threshold.