WLAN Client Steering via AP Capability Matching

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In wireless local area networks (WLANs), WiFi clients with varying capabilities are often randomly distributed among access points (APs) with different capabilities, leading to suboptimal utilization of advanced features like MU-MIMO, as clients with lower capabilities cannot take advantage of APs with higher capabilities.

Innovation Solution

Implement a system where multiple APs forward probe requests from WiFi clients to an AP controller, which selects APs based on matching capabilities between clients and APs, ensuring clients connect to APs that support their features, thereby optimizing AP utilization and client performance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If WiFi clients are randomly distributed among multiple APs, then clients can connect to any available AP, but advanced features like MU-MIMO cannot be utilized and network performance is suboptimal

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenetwork throughputVSAvoidclient connection process
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback by having the AC receive probe requests from clients, determine client capabilities, and use this information to make intelligent AP selection decisions. The AC continuously monitors and adjusts client-to-AP assignments based on capability matching, enabling advanced features like MU-MIMO to be utilized when appropriate.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the parameter of AP selection from random or signal-strength-based to capability-based selection. By evaluating client capabilities (such as MU-MIMO support, bandwidth requirements) and matching them with appropriate AP capabilities, the system optimizes network performance while maintaining ease of connection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Adaptability or versatility

If clients with different capabilities are mixed on the same AP, then the AP can serve diverse clients, but high-capability clients cannot take advantage of advanced features

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveAP client compatibilityVSAvoidfeature utilization efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the client population based on capabilities and assigns them to different APs accordingly. The AC divides clients into groups (e.g., MU-MIMO capable vs. non-capable, different bandwidth requirements) and steers each group to appropriate APs that can fully utilize their capabilities, rather than mixing all clients on every AP.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies local quality by matching specific client capability requirements with specific AP capabilities. Each AP is optimized for certain capability profiles, and clients are directed to the AP that provides the best match for their specific needs, enabling advanced features where appropriate while maintaining broad compatibility elsewhere.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Productivity

If the AC controls AP selection based on capability matching, then network performance is optimized, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveAP utilization efficiencyVSAvoidcontrol system architecture
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The AC serves as an intermediary between clients and APs, centralizing the capability-matching logic. Instead of having each AP independently decide which clients to serve, the AC receives probe requests, determines client capabilities, and makes the AP selection decision. This centralization manages complexity by consolidating control functions in a single entity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS10159039B2Steering wireless local area network (WLAN) clients
Publication Date: 2018.12.18 FORTINET INC
  • US10159039B2 patent drawing
  • US10159039B2 patent drawing
  • US10159039B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for steering WiFi clients based on capabilities of the clients and access points (APs) are provided. According to one embodiment, multiple access points (APs) of a wireless local area network (WLAN) receives probe requests from a WLAN client for joining the WLAN. The APs forward the probe requests to an AP controller (AC) that controls the APs of the WLAN. The AC selects one or more of the multiple APs based at least on the matching of the capability of the WLAN client and capabilities of the multiple APs and sends a confirmation to one or more of selected APs. The selected APs accept the probe requests to allow the WLAN client to join the WLAN through the one or more selected APs.