WLAN ERSP Signaling for Low-Latency RSP Extension

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing wireless local area network (WLAN) systems face challenges in satisfying low-latency traffic requirements due to legacy STAs that do not support Restricted Service Period (RSP), Overlapping Basic Service Set (OBSS) STAs, or unfavorable channel conditions, limiting the effectiveness of RSP extensions.

Innovation Solution

A method and apparatus for signaling Extended RSP (ERSP) is introduced, where a beacon frame includes allocation information on ERSP, indicating its presence, end time, and duration, using previously defined frames like trigger frames, QoS null frames, or QoS data frames to extend the RSP and meet low-latency traffic demands.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of time

If RSP is allocated for low-latency traffic, then low-latency traffic requirements can be satisfied, but legacy STAs and OBSS STAs cause interference and prevent RSP from effectively meeting low-latency requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovelatencyVSAvoidRSP effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The RSP is made dynamic by allowing extension beyond its originally allocated duration. The ERSP mechanism enables the RSP to adapt its time duration based on actual traffic needs and channel conditions, transforming from a fixed static period to a flexible dynamic period that can extend when legacy STAs or OBSS STAs cause interference

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary action by allocating an initial RSP duration in advance through beacon frames, then uses ERSP signaling to extend this period when needed. The TWT information element is prepared in advance with extension capabilities, allowing the system to quickly respond to interference conditions without complex real-time negotiations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Loss of time

If RSP duration is extended to satisfy low-latency traffic, then traffic requirements are better met, but signaling complexity and system overhead increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovelatencyVSAvoidsignaling complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The TWT information element serves multiple functions: it originally schedules TWT periods and now also signals ERSP extension. By making this existing element multi-functional, the patent avoids creating separate signaling mechanisms, thereby reducing overall signaling complexity while enabling RSP extension capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The ERSP signaling reuses the existing TWT information element structure and format. Instead of creating a new complex signaling protocol, the system copies and adapts the proven TWT element to carry ERSP extension information, leveraging existing parsing and processing capabilities in STAs

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Loss of information

If ERSP signaling is implemented using new frame types, then ERSP information can be clearly signaled, but backward compatibility with legacy systems is compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveERSP information signalingVSAvoidbackward compatibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

Existing frame types (beacon frames, TWT information elements) are made multi-functional to carry both traditional scheduling information and new ERSP extension information. This allows legacy STAs to ignore the new fields while RSP-supported STAs can utilize them, maintaining backward compatibility

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The TWT information element acts as an intermediary that bridges legacy and new functionality. It carries ERSP signaling in a way that is transparent to legacy STAs (which simply ignore unknown fields) while providing full functionality to modern STAs that understand and process the extension information

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Device complexity

If RSP is strictly enforced without extension, then signaling overhead is minimized, but low-latency traffic requirements cannot be satisfied under unfavorable channel conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesignaling overheadVSAvoidlatency
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The RSP transitions from a static fixed-duration period to a dynamic extendable period. The ERSP mechanism allows the RSP duration to adapt based on actual channel conditions and traffic requirements, enabling the system to maintain low signaling overhead during good conditions while providing extension capability when needed

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS12610393B2Method and device for signaling ERSP in wireless LAN system
Publication Date: 2026.04.21 LG ELECTRONICS INC
  • US12610393B2 patent drawing
  • US12610393B2 patent drawing
  • US12610393B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method and a device for signaling an ERSP in a wireless LAN system are presented. Specifically, a first reception STA receives a beacon frame from a transmission STA. The first reception STA receives a first frame from the transmission STA during an RSP. The beacon frame includes allocation information about the RSP. The first frame includes signaling information about the ERSP having an extended RSP. The first frame is transmitted when the ERSP starts. The signaling information about the ERSP includes information about whether an ERSP is present, information about the time when the ERSP ends, and information about the duration of the ERSP.