WLAN Sub-band Allocation for Mixed Latency Requirements

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current CSMA/CA systems in WLANs face challenges in accommodating users with varying latency requirements, as existing priority mechanisms do not adequately address the needs of time-critical applications that require even shorter delays than those provided for high-priority services like voice.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a method where wireless communication devices with different latency requirements use a listen-before-talk approach, allowing at most one device with a low latency requirement to access a sub-band, and enforcing a maximum transmission duration for devices with higher latency requirements, based on the low latency requirement, to ensure efficient channel access while fragmenting data and using multiple sub-bands if necessary.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of time

If traditional CSMA/CA with priority categories is used, then high-priority services like voice can achieve shorter delays, but time-critical applications requiring even shorter delays cannot be adequately served

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovedelayVSAvoidlatency requirement accommodation
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The frequency bandwidth is segmented into multiple sub-bands, allowing devices with different latency requirements to access different sub-bands. This segmentation enables fine-grained control over channel access, where low-latency devices can be assigned dedicated sub-bands while high-latency devices share other sub-bands, thus accommodating diverse latency requirements simultaneously

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different quality parameters are applied to different sub-bands based on local requirements. Sub-bands allocated to low-latency devices have stricter transmission duration limits and priority access rules, while sub-bands for high-latency devices allow longer transmissions and standard CSMA/CA behavior, optimizing performance for each device type in its specific context

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Productivity

If multiple devices with low latency requirements are allowed to access the same sub-band simultaneously, then channel utilization increases, but collision probability increases and latency requirements may not be met

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechannel utilizationVSAvoidlatency guarantee
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of allowing multiple low-latency devices to contend for the same sub-band, the system segments the bandwidth so that each low-latency device gets its own dedicated sub-band. This eliminates collisions among low-latency devices while maintaining high channel utilization through parallel transmissions across multiple sub-bands

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The access point acts as an intermediary that allocates specific sub-bands to specific low-latency devices based on their latency requirements and current channel conditions. This centralized allocation mechanism prevents collisions while maximizing overall channel utilization by dynamically managing sub-band assignments

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Productivity

If transmissions from high-latency devices are allowed without time limits, then their throughput is maximized, but they may occupy the channel too long and prevent low-latency devices from accessing the channel

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovethroughputVSAvoidchannel access delay
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

Different transmission duration constraints are applied locally to different devices based on their latency requirements. Low-latency devices have strict maximum transmission duration limits enforced on their dedicated sub-bands, ensuring they cannot monopolize the channel, while high-latency devices on other sub-bands are allowed longer transmissions to maximize their throughput

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements periodic channel access opportunities for low-latency devices within their maximum transmission duration window. Even if a high-latency device is transmitting, low-latency devices can access the channel in periodic intervals, ensuring their latency requirements are met while allowing high-latency devices to maintain reasonable throughput

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Data Source

PatentUS10470215B2Coexistence of users with different latency requirements
Publication Date: 2019.11.05 TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET LM ERICSSON (PUBL)
  • US10470215B2 patent drawing
  • US10470215B2 patent drawing
  • US10470215B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of an access point is disclosed. The access point is adapted to communicate (using a frequency bandwidth comprising one or more sub-bands) with wireless communication devices associated with the access point. Each of the wireless communication devices is adapted to operate under at least one of first and second latency requirements, wherein the first latency requirement is lower than the second latency requirement. Each of the wireless communication devices is also adapted to use a listen-before-talk approach (e.g. carrier sense multiple access with collision avoidance—CSMA/CA) to access a sub-band for transmission. The method comprises (for each of the sub-bands) allowing at most one wireless communication device operating under the first latency requirement to attempt accessing the sub-band and (for each sub-band where a wireless communication device operating under the first latency requirement is allowed to attempt accessing the sub-band) allowing also one or more wireless communication device operating under the second latency requirement to attempt accessing the sub-band. The method also comprises enforcing a maximum duration of time for each transmission of a wireless communication device operating under the second latency requirement using a sub-band where a wireless communication device operating under the first latency requirement is allowed to attempt accessing the sub-band, wherein the maximum duration of time is based on the first latency requirement. Corresponding method for a wireless communication device, arrangements, access point, wireless communication device and computer program products are also disclosed.