WLAN Traffic Stream Coordination for OBSS Interference

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Next-generation wireless local area networks (WLANs) face challenges in improving spectrum efficiency and area throughput, especially in dense environments with overlapping basic service sets (OBSS) and high user loads, where conventional methods struggle to meet Quality of Service (QoS) requirements for data traffic like video streaming.

Innovation Solution

The method involves defining contention-free periods (CFP) and contention periods (CP) within overlapping BSS environments, where access points (APs) broadcast allocation information for traffic streams, allowing unoccupied intervals in CFPs to be used by uplink traffic and excessive downlink traffic to be transmitted in CPs, using specific access parameters to manage channel access and ensure QoS.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If conventional WLAN methods are used in dense environments with overlapping BSSs, then device compatibility and ease of operation are maintained, but spectrum efficiency and area throughput deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespectrum efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The service interval is segmented into contention-free period (CFP) and contention period (CP), with further division into first and second intervals. This segmentation allows different transmission methods to be applied to different time slots, improving spectrum efficiency through coordinated transmissions in CFP while maintaining compatibility through EDCA in CP.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts transmission parameters including CFP duration, interval allocations, and access parameters (AIFSN, CWmin, CWmax, TXOP) based on traffic conditions and BSS overlap scenarios. This dynamic adaptation enables the system to optimize performance for specific conditions while maintaining general compatibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Productivity

If QoS traffic is transmitted without CCA in CFP, then throughput is improved, but reliability deteriorates due to potential interference from OBSS

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovethroughputVSAvoidtransmission reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by establishing CFP with coordinated transmission parameters before actual QoS traffic transmission. Allocation information including access parameters is predetermined and distributed to participating STAs, enabling them to transmit without CCA while maintaining reliability through pre-coordinated timing and parameters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses feedback mechanisms where APs and STAs exchange allocation information and adjust transmission parameters based on observed interference conditions and traffic patterns. This feedback loop allows the system to adapt CFP parameters to maintain reliability while maximizing throughput.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If CCA is performed during CFP for uplink traffic, then transmission reliability is improved, but latency increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransmission reliabilityVSAvoidlatency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

Different CCA requirements are applied locally to different traffic types and time intervals within CFP. Downlink QoS traffic transmits without CCA for low latency, while uplink traffic in certain intervals performs CCA for reliability. This local differentiation optimizes the trade-off between latency and reliability for each specific transmission scenario.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Productivity

If excessive downlink traffic is transmitted in CP, then QoS requirements are met, but interference with other BSSs increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovethroughputVSAvoidinterference
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes transmission parameters including EDCA parameters (AIFSN, CWmin, CWmax, TXOP) and CFP duration based on traffic conditions and interference levels. By adjusting these parameters, the system can transmit excessive downlink traffic in CP when needed while controlling interference through parameter optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically switches between CFP coordinated transmission and CP EDCA transmission based on real-time traffic conditions. When QoS traffic exceeds CFP capacity, the system dynamically allows transmission in CP with appropriate parameter adjustments, balancing throughput requirements against interference generation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS10098145B2Method and device for transmitting and receiving traffic stream in wireless LAN system
Publication Date: 2018.10.09 LG ELECTRONICS INC
  • US10098145B2 patent drawing
  • US10098145B2 patent drawing
  • US10098145B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Provided are a method and a device for transmitting and receiving a traffic stream in a wireless local area network (WLAN) system. Specifically, the device broadcasts a beacon frame including allocation information on a contention-free period (CFP) and allocation information on a contention period (CP) to a station (STA) and transmits a downlink traffic stream to the STA or receives an uplink traffic stream from the STA, based on the allocation information on the CFP. The allocation information on the CFP indicates that the downlink traffic stream is transmitted without performing a clear channel assessment (CCA) during the CFP and indicates that the uplink traffic stream is received with performing a CCA during the CFP.