WLAN TXOP Sharing by Non-AP STAs to Cut Contention

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing WLAN systems face issues with redundant contention, collisions, and underutilized TXOPs due to a lack of coordination across devices, particularly in group-based or dense network environments, leading to inefficiencies in medium access and TXOP utilization.

Innovation Solution

Implementing joint medium access and TXOP sharing mechanisms initiated by non-AP STAs, allowing them to independently obtain and delegate TXOPs, and coordinate transmissions within a group using control frames, reducing dependence on centralized AP control.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If traditional distributed channel access mechanisms are used, then each STA can independently access the medium, but redundant contention and collisions occur leading to underutilized TXOPs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechannel utilizationVSAvoidredundant contention time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the TXOP into multiple sub-TXOPs that can be independently allocated to different STAs within a group. This segmentation allows coordinated access where one STA obtains the TXOP and then shares it with other group members through control frames, eliminating redundant contention while maintaining independent access capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a group leader STA as an intermediary that coordinates access for multiple STAs. The group leader obtains the TXOP through contention and then distributes sub-TXOPs to other group members using control frames, acting as a mediator that reduces overall contention while enabling efficient group-based access.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Ease of operation

If TXOP sharing is initiated by AP, then centralized coordination is achieved, but delays occur in P2P communication and relay scenarios

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoordination simplicityVSAvoidaccess delay
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the benefits of centralized coordination with distributed initiation by allowing non-AP STAs to independently obtain TXOPs and initiate sharing within their groups. This combines the simplicity of centralized control with the speed of distributed access, eliminating AP-dependent delays while maintaining coordination through group-based control frames.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent enables preliminary action by allowing non-AP STAs to obtain and initiate TXOPs without waiting for AP coordination. STAs can proactively acquire channel access and begin transmissions immediately, then coordinate with group members through control frames, eliminating the mandatory AP-initiated sequence and reducing access delays.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Adaptability or versatility

If non-AP STAs independently obtain TXOPs, then access flexibility increases, but coordination complexity among group members increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccess flexibilityVSAvoidcoordination complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses a group leader as an intermediary to manage coordination complexity. While non-AP STAs can independently obtain TXOPs, the group leader receives control frames from members and coordinates sub-TXOP allocation, centralizing the coordination logic and preventing exponential complexity growth in multi-STA groups.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a universal control frame structure that handles multiple coordination functions (TXOP sharing, sub-TXOP allocation, group member management) through a single standardized mechanism. This multi-functional control approach reduces coordination complexity by providing a unified interface rather than requiring separate protocols for each coordination scenario.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS20260020058A1System and method for joint medium access and transmit opportunity sharing in wireless local area networks
Publication Date: 2026.01.15 SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD
  • US20260020058A1 patent drawing
  • US20260020058A1 patent drawing
  • US20260020058A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method and system for wireless communication in a wireless local area network (WLAN) are disclosed. The method includes obtaining, by a non-access point (non-AP) station (STA), access to a wireless medium based on a contention-based channel access procedure; initiating, by the non-AP STA, upon obtaining access to the wireless medium, a transmit opportunity (TXOP); transmitting, by the non-AP STA, a control frame to a second STA during the TXOP; and receiving, by the non-AP STA, one or more physical layer protocol data units (PPDUs) from the second STA in accordance with scheduling information in the control frame.