Wood Dive Angle Measurement Using Light Reflection Patterns

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for determining grain angles in wood using light reflection patterns, such as the T2 technology, face errors in dive angle calculation due to non-uniform sensor sensitivity and assumptions of circular tracheid cross-sections, leading to inconsistencies in measuring high dive angles and knot sizes, which affect lumber grading and twist prediction.

Innovation Solution

The method involves using peak and valley differences in light reflection patterns, combined with knowledge of wood surface microstructure, to improve dive angle estimation and locate pith and ring curvature, allowing for more accurate knot size estimation and twist prediction by positioning sensors at critical angles and employing algorithms like inverse parabola interpolation and staple models.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If the T2 technology uses a ring of sensors to measure light reflection patterns, then grain direction can be identified, but systematic errors occur in dive angle calculation when peaks are too close together or peak heights are significantly different

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedive angle measurement precisionVSAvoidmeasurement consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the measurement parameters by using multiple view angles (not just a single 45-degree angle) and processing the difference in reflection intensities between these angles. This allows the system to maintain measurement precision even when peaks are close together or have significantly different heights, resolving the contradiction between precision and reliability in dive angle calculation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary computational approach by calculating dive angle from the difference in reflection intensities at multiple view angles rather than directly from peak positions. This intermediary method (using intensity differences as a mediator) provides more reliable and consistent measurements under varying grain conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Device complexity

If the assumption of uniform side wall orientation distribution is made, then surface and dive angles can be calculated from peak positions, but errors are introduced when ring curvature or non-vertical grain is present

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecalculation complexityVSAvoidangle calculation accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes from using a single view angle to using multiple view angles, and changes the calculation parameter from peak position to intensity difference. This resolves the contradiction by maintaining calculation simplicity while improving accuracy for curved surfaces and non-vertical grain through the use of intensity differences at multiple angles.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Device complexity

If sensors are placed at critical locations to reduce the number of sensors, then device complexity is reduced, but measurement accuracy may be compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesensor array complexityVSAvoidgrain angle measurement accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by placing sensors at specific critical view angles (multiple angles rather than a full ring) where the measurement information is most valuable. This selective placement at critical locations reduces device complexity while maintaining measurement accuracy through the use of intensity differences at these strategically chosen angles.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach reduces systematic errors in dive angle calculations, enhances the accuracy of knot size estimation, and improves twist prediction by utilizing valley differences and peak height variations, enabling more precise grading and sorting of lumber.

Implementation Method 1

patterns of light scatter (both specular and diffuse) can be interpreted to infer geometric properties of the small fibers that constitute materials such as wood

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLight reflection: Reflection

Implementation Method 2

The reflected shape of a round spot of laser light will appear elongated when reflected off the surface of wood

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLight scattering: Scattering

Data Source

PatentUS7715011B2Methods for using light reflection patterns to determine location of pith and curvature of the annual ring
Publication Date: 2010.05.11 WEYERHAEUSER NR CO
  • US7715011B2 patent drawing
  • US7715011B2 patent drawing
  • US7715011B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods are provided for using light reflection patterns to determine various properties of fibrous materials, such as wood. More specifically, the present invention relates to methods for determining a dive angle for grain. Further, the present invention relates to methods for using information in T2 plots, combined with knowledge of the microstructure of a wood sample surface, to find pith location and/or ring curvature.