Wood Extraction Percolator Layered Particle Segmentation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current wood extraction processes are inefficient and costly, particularly when extracting taxifolin with ethanol or arabinogalactan with water, as they result in excessive pressure drops and contamination of the extraction fluid, leading to the need for additional filtration steps and reduced energy efficiency.

Innovation Solution

The process involves creating a layered structure of wood particles in a percolator, with finer particles forming a lower permeability layer that acts as a prefilter, allowing the extraction fluid to flow through and increasing pressure, thereby reducing pressure drops and minimizing contamination, allowing for more efficient extraction of taxifolin and arabinogalactan.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If fine wood particles are used in the extraction bed, then extraction efficiency is improved, but permeability decreases causing excessive pressure drop

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveextraction efficiencyVSAvoidpressure drop
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSStress or pressure

Solution Approach 1:

The extraction bed is segmented into two distinct layers: a lower layer with coarser wood particles and an upper layer with finer wood particles. This segmentation allows each layer to perform its specific function - the lower layer provides high permeability to maintain low pressure drop, while the upper layer provides high extraction efficiency. The segmentation resolves the contradiction by spatially separating the conflicting requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different regions of the extraction bed are assigned different particle size qualities. The upper layer uses fine particles (0.5-2 mm) optimized for extraction efficiency, while the lower layer uses coarse particles (2-5 mm) optimized for permeability. This local differentiation of quality allows the system to simultaneously achieve high extraction efficiency and low pressure drop that would be impossible with uniform particle size.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Productivity

If fine wood particles are used, then extraction yield is improved, but contamination of extractant increases requiring additional filtration

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveextraction yieldVSAvoidcontamination of extractant
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The coarse lower layer acts as an intermediary between the extraction fluid and the fine upper layer. It serves as a support structure that prevents fine particles from being washed away into the extractant stream, while still allowing the extractant to pass through and contact the fine particles for efficient extraction. This intermediary layer resolves the contradiction by enabling high extraction yield without the harmful contamination that would otherwise require additional filtration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Productivity

If fine wood particles are used, then mass transfer is improved, but fluid circulation capability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemass transfer efficiencyVSAvoidfluid circulation capability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The extraction bed is segmented into two distinct layers: a lower layer with coarser wood particles and an upper layer with finer wood particles. This segmentation allows each layer to perform its specific function - the lower layer provides high permeability to maintain low pressure drop, while the upper layer provides high extraction efficiency. The segmentation resolves the contradiction by spatially separating the conflicting requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different regions of the extraction bed are assigned different particle size qualities. The upper layer uses fine particles (0.5-2 mm) optimized for extraction efficiency, while the lower layer uses coarse particles (2-5 mm) optimized for permeability. This local differentiation of quality allows the system to simultaneously achieve high extraction efficiency and low pressure drop that would be impossible with uniform particle size.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This method enhances the circulation capability of the extraction fluid, reduces the need for downstream filtration, and increases the yield of taxifolin and arabinogalactan by maintaining fluid purity and optimizing energy use.

Implementation Method 1

the fine layer possesses a lower permeability than the further layer... the lower permeability of the fine layer thus increases the pressure above the fine layer and reduces a pressure drop along the height of the layers

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure drop: Pressure Drop

Implementation Method 2

the fine layer thus also serves as a prefilter... With each pass the extractant passes through the fine layer, so that the fine wood particles and any impurities remain caught in the fine layer

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFiltration: Filter (physical)

Data Source

PatentUS9434790B2Process for the extraction of wood
Publication Date: 2016.09.06 LDA AG
  • US9434790B2 patent drawing
  • US9434790B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention relates to a process for the extraction of wood, comprising the following steps: providing wood particles, at least a first class and a second class, stacking a fine layer consisting of the first class wood particles over a further layer consisting of the second class wood particles, and extracting the wood particles using a liquid extractant, in which the extractant flows from the top downwards, first through the fine layer and then through the further layer, in which the wood particles of the first class are finer than the wood particles of the second class, and thus the fine layer has a lower permeability than the further layer.