Wooden Bracing Bars with Metal End Caps for Cargo Containers

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing cargo container bracing systems using steel rods are expensive and prone to permanent deformation during use, failing to effectively restrain bulk cargo against longitudinal movement.

Innovation Solution

A bracing system utilizing rectangular wood bracing bars with end caps that fit into U-channels in the container walls, providing a tight frictional fit to resist vertical displacement and longitudinal movement, with the end caps configured to accommodate 2×4 lumber for increased strength.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If steel rods are used for bracing, then the bracing system provides sufficient strength to restrain cargo, but the cost increases and the rods are subject to permanent deformation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebracing strengthVSAvoidpermanent deformation
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces expensive steel rods with wooden bracing bars that are cheaper and can be replaced after use. The wooden bars are designed as disposable or single-use components that eliminate the problem of permanent deformation accumulation, as each new bar starts with full structural integrity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention uses composite construction by combining wooden bracing bars with metal end caps. The wood provides the main bracing function while the metal end caps provide durable connection points in the U-channels, creating a hybrid structure that leverages the advantages of both materials

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Strength

If steel rods are used for bracing, then the bracing system provides sufficient strength, but the cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebracing strengthVSAvoidcost
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent substitutes expensive steel rods with inexpensive wooden bracing bars. The wooden material is significantly cheaper than steel, reducing the overall cost of the bracing system while maintaining sufficient structural strength for cargo restraint

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes the material parameter from steel to wood, fundamentally altering the cost structure. This material substitution maintains the bracing function while dramatically reducing material costs

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Stability of the object's composition

If end caps are added to bracing bars, then the frictional fit in U-channels prevents vertical displacement, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevertical displacement resistanceVSAvoidnumber of components
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the end cap and bracing bar into a single integrated component. The end caps are attached to the ends of the wooden bracing bars, creating a unified assembly that simplifies installation and reduces the number of separate parts to manage

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The end caps serve as intermediary elements that facilitate the connection between the wooden bracing bar and the metal U-channels. These caps provide the necessary frictional contact surface in the U-channel while protecting the wooden bar ends

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system effectively restrains cargo against longitudinal movement while being cost-effective and durable, avoiding the need for additional fasteners and spacers, and can be easily reused or recycled.

Implementation Method 1

The channel section is configured for a frictional fit in the U-channel to resist vertical displacement in the U-channel once a bracing bar with a pair of end caps is forced into a horizontal position across the opening of the cargo container

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Data Source

PatentUS8459916B2Bracing system and method for cargo containers
Publication Date: 2013.06.11 NORSEMAN INC
  • US8459916B2 patent drawing
  • US8459916B2 patent drawing
  • US8459916B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A bracing system and method are provided to restrain cargo against longitudinal movement within a cargo container. The system uses U-channels in opposing side walls of the cargo container adjacent a rear opening of the cargo container. The system includes one or more bracing bars and an end cap at the first end and at the second end of each bracing bar. Each end cap has a channel section providing an extension to fit in the U-channels of the cargo container. The channel section is configured for a frictional fit in the U-channel to resist vertical displacement in the U-channel once a bracing bar with a pair of end caps is forced into a horizontal position across the opening of the cargo container, with the channel sections in the opposing U-channels.