Work Assist Control for Real-Time Operator Burden Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In production lines, existing measures to reduce operator burden and enhance efficiency are ineffective when there is a shortage of operators, as they rely on human intervention and cannot be fully automated.

Innovation Solution

A work assist device and system that evaluates operator and production facility information to determine and apply improvement measures automatically, reducing operator burden by adjusting work processes and facility settings in real-time.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If automated technologies (industrial robots, process automation systems) are implemented to reduce operator burden, then productivity is improved, but they cannot fully resolve burden in all work processes and require sufficient operators to manage and maintain them

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction efficiencyVSAvoidflexibility in work process
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts work processes and facility settings in real-time based on operator burden evaluation. The control device automatically modifies production parameters, work assignments, and facility operations to optimize both productivity and operator burden reduction, creating a flexible automated system that adapts to changing conditions without requiring additional operators.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs self-optimization by automatically evaluating operator burden and implementing improvement measures without human intervention. The control device autonomously adjusts work processes, reassigns tasks, and modifies facility settings based on real-time data, enabling the production system to self-regulate and reduce operator burden while maintaining productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Ease of operation

If existing measures to reduce operator burden are implemented, then operator burden is reduced in some cases, but they are ineffective when there is a shortage of operators and cannot be fully automated

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperator burdenVSAvoidautomation level
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSExtent of automation

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces manual burden-reduction measures with an automated control device that uses sensors, data processing, and automatic control mechanisms. Instead of relying on operators to identify and implement improvements, the system automatically evaluates burden through data collection and implements optimization measures, achieving high automation in burden reduction while easing operator workload.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously collects data on operator conditions, work processes, and production status, then uses this feedback to automatically adjust and optimize work assignments and facility operations. This closed-loop feedback mechanism enables automated burden reduction that adapts to real-time conditions, effectively reducing operator burden while maintaining high automation levels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Ease of operation

If work processes are manually adjusted to reduce operator burden, then operator burden is reduced, but productivity and efficiency cannot be maintained or enhanced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperator burdenVSAvoidproduction efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically optimizes both operator burden and productivity simultaneously through real-time data analysis and automatic control. The control device adjusts work processes, reassigns tasks, and modifies facility operations to achieve burden reduction while maintaining or enhancing production efficiency, unlike static manual adjustments that compromise productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system automatically modifies multiple parameters including work assignment distributions, facility operating parameters, and process settings to optimize both operator burden and productivity. By coordinating changes across multiple parameters simultaneously, the system achieves burden reduction without sacrificing production efficiency, unlike single-parameter manual adjustments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS11803795B2Work assist device
Publication Date: 2023.10.31 MITSUBISHI ELECTRIC CORP
  • US11803795B2 patent drawing
  • US11803795B2 patent drawing
  • US11803795B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A work assist device includes a work burden degree evaluation unit, an improvement measures storage, a simulation unit, and an improvement measures determination unit. The work burden degree evaluation unit evaluates a work burden degree indicating a degree of burden imposed on an operator due to work from operator information and production facility information. The operator information is information related to the operator performing the work in cooperation with a production facility. The improvement measures storage stores improvement measures for improving the work burden degree. The simulation unit performs simulation of estimating an estimated improvement effect indicating a degree of improvement of the work burden degree when the improvement measures are applied. The improvement measures determination unit determines application improvement measures to be applied to at least one of the operator and the production facility from the improvement measures, based on the estimated improvement effect.