Prioritized Work-Item Tracking via Quantified Rules

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current software development tools struggle to associate computerized work-items with organizational objectives, leading to ad-hoc prioritization and lack of connection between work-item progress and desired outcomes.

Innovation Solution

A system that processes an input master list of computerized work-items to generate a prioritized list based on quantified computer-executable rules, considering contribution and expense sub-components, resource categories, and thresholds.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If ad-hoc prioritization methods are used, then ease of operation is improved, but measurement precision of work-item impact on organizational objectives deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of prioritizationVSAvoidmeasurement precision of work-item impact
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms qualitative prioritization parameters into quantitative measures by establishing a scoring system that assigns numerical values to work-items based on their contribution to organizational objectives. This allows precise measurement of impact while maintaining ease of operation through automated calculation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual ad-hoc prioritization with an automated computerized system that objectively evaluates and ranks work-items based on predefined criteria and organizational objectives, eliminating subjectivity while improving measurement precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Adaptability or versatility

If multiple resources from different categories are considered, then adaptability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to resource constraintsVSAvoidcomplexity of prioritization system
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments resources into distinct categories (e.g., human resources, technical resources, financial resources) and evaluates work-items against each category separately. This segmentation enables the system to handle diverse resource constraints systematically without overwhelming complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a universal prioritization framework that can accommodate multiple resource categories and organizational objectives simultaneously. The same scoring mechanism works across different contexts, providing adaptability without requiring separate complex systems for each resource type.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Measurement precision

If granular decomposition of contributions and expenses is implemented, then measurement precision is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprecision of contribution and expense trackingVSAvoidcomplexity of work-item structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent decomposes work-items into granular components including contributions, expenses, and sub-components, allowing precise tracking of each element's impact on organizational objectives. This segmentation enables detailed measurement while the automated system manages the resulting complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS12236381B1Computerized work-item selection and progress tracking based on a set of quantified computer-executable rules
Publication Date: 2025.02.25 DIGITAL AI SOFTWARE INC
  • US12236381B1 patent drawing
  • US12236381B1 patent drawing
  • US12236381B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Generating an output prioritized list of computerized work-items for prioritizing work based on a set of quantified computer-executable rules includes a structured way of associating contributions and expenses with computerized work-items and enhancing current technological processes of selecting computerized work-items to meet quantified computer-executable rules. The method includes determining a priority order of each sub-component based on quantified computer-executable rules associated with those sub-components, generating tuples having sub-components for each computerized work-item that are arranged based on the priority order, sorting the computerized work-items in descending order of the tuples, and traversing the sorted list of computerized work-items to generate the output prioritized list of computerized work-items for prioritizing work based on quantified computer-executable rules. The method provides the ability of tracking progress of the computerized work-items using standardized or comparable bucket values and measuring progress against the quantified computer-executable rules.