Work Machine Powertrain Control Strategy for Varying Terrain

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for controlling work machines during repeated work cycles are inefficient in terms of fuel consumption and productivity, particularly in varying terrain and load conditions, and do not adequately account for environmental factors.

Innovation Solution

A method that establishes a control strategy based on varying conditions during the work cycle, including operational parameters like weight, inclination, and direction, using detected and predicted data to optimize powertrain operations and reduce wear, by automatically adjusting gear modes and differential gear lock mechanisms.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Use of energy by moving object

If a fixed gear mode is used throughout the work cycle, then the control system is simple, but fuel consumption increases and productivity decreases due to inability to adapt to varying terrain and load conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefuel consumptionVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by making the gear mode variable rather than fixed. The control system dynamically adjusts the gear mode based on detected operational parameters (speed, load, inclination) and the current phase of the work cycle. This allows the transmission system to adapt its characteristics to match the varying demands of different terrain conditions and work phases, optimizing fuel consumption without requiring overly complex control logic.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameter of gear mode based on detected operational conditions. The control system monitors parameters such as vehicle speed, load conditions, and ground inclination, then selects appropriate gear modes from available options. This parameter-based adaptation enables the system to respond to varying terrain and work conditions, reducing fuel consumption while maintaining manageable control system complexity through structured decision-making.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Use of energy by moving object

If gear mode is frequently changed to optimize performance, then fuel consumption decreases, but component wear increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefuel consumptionVSAvoidcomponent wear
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The control system performs preliminary action by predicting upcoming changes in work conditions based on the known work cycle pattern and terrain profile. Before the actual change in load or speed demand occurs, the system proactively adjusts the gear mode to be prepared for the anticipated conditions. This prevents sudden, frequent gear changes that would increase component wear, while still achieving fuel optimization through timely gear selection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses feedback from detected operational parameters (speed, load, inclination) to monitor actual performance and adjust gear mode selections. By continuously comparing expected versus actual operating conditions, the control system can smooth out unnecessary gear changes and only switch gears when genuinely beneficial, thereby reducing component wear while maintaining fuel efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Productivity

If the control system adapts to varying work conditions, then productivity increases, but the complexity of detecting and measuring operational parameters increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial transportation efficiencyVSAvoidoperational parameter detection
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The control system applies universality by using a single integrated control unit that performs multiple functions: detecting operational parameters, determining work cycle phase, selecting gear modes, and controlling differential lock mechanisms. This multi-functional approach enables the system to adapt to varying work conditions and optimize productivity without requiring separate complex detection systems for each parameter, as one control unit handles all sensing and decision-making tasks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentEP2146885B1A method for controlling a work machine during operation in a repeated work cycle
Publication Date: 2014.07.23 VOLVO CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT AB
  • EP2146885B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2146885B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2146885B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4

AI summary

The invention relates to a method A method for controlling a work machine during operation in a repeated work cycle comprising the steps of establishing a control strategy on the basis of at least one condition that varies in the course of the work cycle, and controlling at least one device in a work machine power transmission system in response to the established control strategy during.