Work Management Platform Matching Workers to Orders

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current work management techniques, especially in the gig economy and shipping industries, face challenges in efficiently matching workers with orders due to scheduling conflicts, communication issues, and the need to balance cost and quality, often leading to suboptimal outcomes and increased costs.

Innovation Solution

A work management platform that uses machine learning models to calculate order-worker scores based on order characteristics and past worker behavior, optimizing the matching process to predict selection and completion likelihoods, and dynamically adjusts assignments to improve workflow efficiency and worker satisfaction.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional heuristic techniques are used to match workers with orders, then the matching process is simple and fast, but the matching accuracy is low leading to suboptimal outcomes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematching accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces traditional heuristic matching methods with machine learning models that use historical data and worker characteristics to predict order completion likelihood. This substitution of mechanical/heuristic systems with intelligent algorithms resolves the contradiction by achieving higher matching accuracy through data-driven predictions while managing complexity through automated model training and inference processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback loops where actual order completion data is continuously fed back to retrain and improve the machine learning models. This feedback mechanism enables the system to learn from past performance and progressively improve matching accuracy over time, resolving the contradiction between achieving high precision and managing system complexity through iterative optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If more offers and incentives are provided to workers, then the likelihood of order completion increases, but the costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveorder completion rateVSAvoidcost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by using machine learning models to predict which workers are most likely to complete orders before making offers. By identifying high-probability candidates in advance through data analysis, the system can target offers more precisely, increasing completion rates while reducing the need for widespread incentivizing, thus resolving the contradiction between reliability and cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts offer parameters such as incentives and compensation based on predicted worker responsiveness and order characteristics. By changing these parameters optimally rather than uniformly, the system achieves higher completion rates for critical orders while minimizing unnecessary spending on orders or workers where completion is already highly likely, resolving the cost-reliability tradeoff.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Adaptability or versatility

If the platform makes multiple offers to workers for the same order, then the likelihood of finding a suitable worker increases, but the time and resources consumed increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveworker selection flexibilityVSAvoidmatching time
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary filtering using machine learning models to identify a small set of highly probable candidate workers before making offers. This preliminary action based on historical data and worker characteristics reduces the need for multiple sequential offers, maintaining adaptability in worker selection while significantly reducing the time and resources spent on the matching process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Ease of operation

If the platform assigns orders based on simple criteria, then the assignment process is fast, but the worker satisfaction and engagement decrease

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveassignment speedVSAvoidworker engagement
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces simple assignment criteria with machine learning-based predictions that consider worker preferences, historical performance, and order characteristics. This substitution maintains operational speed through automated processing while significantly improving worker engagement by making assignments that are more likely to match worker preferences and capabilities, thus resolving the contradiction between ease of operation and reliability of engagement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS20240220894A1Work management platform
Publication Date: 2024.07.04 SHIPT INC
  • US20240220894A1 patent drawing
  • US20240220894A1 patent drawing
  • US20240220894A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A platform for managing work is disclosed. In example embodiments, the platform may match orders and workers. In some embodiments, the platform may use one or more models that have inputs related to order characteristics or past worker behavior. In some embodiments, the platform may receive future orders and actualize future orders. To actualize future orders, the platform may use one or more models that have inputs related to order characteristics or past worker behavior. In some examples, orders may be shopping orders or deliveries. In some examples, workers may be shoppers or drivers.