Work Order Prediction via Sensor Signal Activity Patterns

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The existing servicing methods for intrusion detection and alarm security systems often result in excessive technician dispatches, incorrect technician scheduling, and inadequate equipment, leading to environmental and safety issues, longer job completion times, and unsatisfied customers due to ad-hoc scheduling and lack of necessary supplies.

Innovation Solution

A work order prediction system that analyzes historical sensor signal activity and service records to predict future job requirements, using server computers to generate models and reports that help dispatch personnel prepare and schedule technician visits effectively.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If technicians are dispatched for every service request using traditional methods, then customer service coverage is maintained, but excessive dispatches lead to environmental harm, safety risks, and increased costs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveservice coverageVSAvoidenvironmental and safety impacts
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary analysis of sensor signal activity patterns before dispatching technicians. By monitoring and analyzing sensor data trends in advance, the system predicts potential failures and schedules service proactively, reducing unnecessary emergency dispatches and their associated environmental and safety harms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements continuous feedback loops by monitoring sensor signal activity, comparing it against historical patterns, and adjusting service dispatch decisions accordingly. This feedback mechanism enables the system to learn from past service outcomes and optimize future dispatches, minimizing unnecessary trips while maintaining reliable service coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If technicians are dispatched frequently to ensure service coverage, then customer needs are met, but job completion time increases and profit margins erode

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveservice coverageVSAvoidjob completion efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system prepares service work orders in advance by analyzing sensor activity patterns and predicting potential issues. This preliminary preparation allows technicians to arrive with the right parts and knowledge, reducing on-site troubleshooting time and enabling faster job completion.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts service scheduling based on real-time sensor data analysis. By continuously monitoring sensor signal activity and comparing it against evolving historical patterns, the system optimizes dispatch timing and technician allocation, improving overall service efficiency and productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Adaptability or versatility

If ad-hoc scheduling is used for service calls, then flexibility is maintained, but incorrect technician skills and inadequate equipment lead to service failures

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvescheduling flexibilityVSAvoidservice quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary analysis of sensor signal activity patterns and service history before generating work orders. This advance preparation includes identifying the specific technician skills and equipment needed, allowing for proactive scheduling of appropriately qualified technicians with the right resources.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses feedback from historical service data and sensor activity patterns to continuously improve technician assignment accuracy. By analyzing past service outcomes and correlating them with sensor patterns, the system learns to match technician skills and equipment to specific service scenarios more effectively.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS10380521B2Predicting service for intrusion and alarm systems based on signal activity patterns
Publication Date: 2019.08.13 TYCO INTEGRATED SECURITY
  • US10380521B2 patent drawing
  • US10380521B2 patent drawing
  • US10380521B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A work order prediction system is described. The work order prediction system analyzes retrieved sensor signal activity records to compare counts of signal activity in defined signal groupings to corresponding predetermined thresholds of sensor signal activity and generates a report based on the comparison when sensor signal activity exceeds the determined threshold values. The predetermined thresholds of sensor signal are determined for each signal grouping by comparing corresponding groupings of service record activity against determined counts of historical sensor signal activity to establish threshold values for each of the groupings and produce a model based on the comparison of the historical sensor signal activity to service activity.