Work Order Refinement via Clarifying Questions

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current systems for managing service requests lack a mechanism for clients and service providers to interact electronically, leading to unclear work orders and misunderstandings, which can result in inefficiencies and increased costs due to the need for on-site repairs or complex vendor management.

Innovation Solution

A system that allows clients and service providers to interact electronically by posing clarifying questions to refine work orders before acceptance, with responses incorporated into the work order process, enabling all parties to understand terms and conditions clearly.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a company contracts with multiple local vendors for service requests, then service coverage is improved, but vendor management complexity and cost control deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveservice coverageVSAvoidvendor management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a centralized service management platform that acts as an intermediary between the company and multiple local vendors. This platform standardizes service request routing, vendor selection, and performance tracking, allowing the company to maintain control over service quality and costs while utilizing multiple vendors for broad coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The service management system performs multiple functions including work order creation, vendor matching, service monitoring, and billing consolidation. This multi-functional approach simplifies vendor management by consolidating what would otherwise be separate complex processes into a single unified system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Productivity

If work orders are sent directly to vendors without clarification, then processing speed is improved, but misunderstanding and rework increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing speedVSAvoidwork order clarity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically performs preliminary actions by generating clarifying questions and routing them to the appropriate parties before the work order is finalized. This pre-clarification process ensures all necessary information is confirmed before service begins, reducing misunderstandings without significantly delaying processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements a feedback mechanism where clarifying questions are automatically generated and answered before work order acceptance. This feedback loop ensures that any ambiguities in the work order are resolved prior to vendor execution, improving both clarity and eventual processing efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If on-site technicians are deployed for all service requests, then service quality is improved, but operational costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveservice qualityVSAvoidoperational cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically determines the appropriate service delivery method for each work order based on factors such as service type, location, urgency, and vendor capabilities. This dynamic approach allows the system to select from multiple service models (remote, hybrid, on-site) to optimize the balance between service quality and cost efficiency for each specific request.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS8538788B1System for work order refinement prior to acceptance and methods thereof
Publication Date: 2013.09.17 ADP INC
  • US8538788B1 patent drawing
  • US8538788B1 patent drawing
  • US8538788B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and method for managing requests for services, in particular via the use of the Internet, where requests for service may be refined before they are accepted. In response to the receipt of a service request from a service requester, a work order is created and routed to one or more of the service providers for the purpose of having one or more of the selected service providers indicate an acceptance of the work order. This work order can be later refined, for example if changes need to be made, especially in response to queries from the service providers.