Work Schedule Optimization System for Assembly Line Ergonomics

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The assignment and rotation of workers on assembly lines often result in sub-optimal assignments due to the vast number of possible combinations, leading to increased workplace injuries, reduced worker satisfaction, and decreased product quality, as supervisors struggle to account for various variables like training, experience, and ergonomic impacts.

Innovation Solution

A system and method for generating optimized work schedules based on identified parameters such as ergonomic impact, training, and experience, using a processor to receive and process information about workers and tasks, and outputting schedules that prioritize selected optimization parameters to improve worker satisfaction and product quality.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If a supervisor manually assigns workers to positions, then the assignment process is simple and direct, but the number of possible combinations becomes too large to evaluate, resulting in sub-optimal assignments

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesimplicity of assignment processVSAvoidoptimality of worker assignment
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical manual assignment process with an automated computer-based system that uses algorithms to evaluate all possible worker-position-rotation combinations. The system receives variables including worker skills, position requirements, and rotation constraints, then automatically generates optimized assignments that would be impossible for a human supervisor to evaluate manually among 6.4×10^15 combinations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the approach from evaluating assignments based on limited human judgment to systematically evaluating all combinations based on multiple quantified parameters including worker training levels, experience, ergonomic impacts on different body parts, position requirements, and rotation schedules. This parameter-based evaluation enables optimal assignment selection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If all possible worker-position-rotation combinations are evaluated to find the optimal assignment, then assignment optimality improves, but the computational complexity and time required increases dramatically

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoptimality of worker assignmentVSAvoidcomplexity of assignment system
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the complex assignment problem into manageable components by receiving separate variables for worker characteristics, position requirements, rotation constraints, and ergonomic parameters. The system processes these segmented inputs through modular evaluation steps, ultimately combining them to select the optimal assignment from all possible combinations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The computer-based system acts as an intermediary between the vast space of possible assignments and the final optimal selection. It receives multiple input variables, processes them through systematic evaluation, and produces the optimized assignment schedule, mediating the complexity by automating the evaluation process that would otherwise be intractable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If worker assignments optimize for multiple variables including ergonomic impact, training, and experience, then worker satisfaction and product quality improve, but the number of variables to account for increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduct quality and worker satisfactionVSAvoidnumber of variables to manage
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a universal system that simultaneously evaluates multiple variables including worker training levels, experience, ergonomic impacts on various body parts, position requirements, and rotation constraints. The single automated system performs all these evaluations concurrently and integrates them to produce optimized assignments that balance all competing factors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system transforms multiple qualitative variables (ergonomic impact, training quality, experience level) into quantifiable parameters that can be systematically evaluated. By converting these diverse factors into measurable parameters with assigned weights, the system can objectively compare different assignment options across all variables simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS8005701B2Systems and methods for generating a work schedule
Publication Date: 2011.08.23 BAYERISCHE MOTOREN WERKE AG
  • US8005701B2 patent drawing
  • US8005701B2 patent drawing
  • US8005701B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for generating work schedules are provided. Work schedules are generated based on an identification of work periods and tasks and information related to the workers. A work schedule is produced based on a selected optimization parameter. The optimization parameter can be any type of parameter related to the tasks and workers. The optimization parameter can be ergonomic impact, level of training, experience level or the like. The systems and methods can also receive assigned tasks for one or more of the workers, and generate a schedule incorporating the assignments.