Agricultural Work Tool Mounting with Resilient Sealing Rings

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing agricultural machine work tool protection systems face issues with unstable and costly guidance, frequent wear, and changing working angles due to inadequate structural designs, leading to vibration and increased maintenance needs.

Innovation Solution

A device featuring a swinging mounting with resilient sealing rings and a compression spring between the load-bearing frame and work tool, utilizing anti-slip sealing rings and oil lubrication for stable guidance, and a compression spring for swing absorption, ensuring firm and accurate tool positioning.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If rubber elements are used to attach the work tool to the frame, then the tool can deflect under load, but precise and firm guidance of the tool cannot be achieved and the tool permanently vibrates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecushioning capabilityVSAvoidguidance stability
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The mounting system is divided into separate functional components: a rigid bracket for structural support and positioning, and a resilient element (spring or rubber) for cushioning. This segmentation allows each component to perform its specific function optimally - the bracket provides stable guidance while the resilient element absorbs shocks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

A silent block or resilient element is introduced as an intermediary between the rigid bracket and the work tool. This intermediary component provides the necessary cushioning while maintaining stable guidance, resolving the contradiction between shock absorption and guidance stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Stability of the object's composition

If a coiled spring with swivelling mounting is used, then the work tool is guided firmly, but the structure becomes more complicated and more expensive

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveguidance stabilityVSAvoidmounting structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The complex swivelling mounting mechanism is removed and replaced with a simpler rigid bracket connection. The essential cushioning function is extracted and performed by a simple resilient element, eliminating the need for complex mechanical joints while maintaining guidance stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of using a rigid joint with added resilience (complex approach), the invention inverts the approach by using a rigid bracket for stability and adding a simple resilient element for cushioning. This simplifies the overall structure while achieving the same functional results.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

3Adaptability or versatility

If a pinned joint is used for swivelling mounting, then the tool can rotate, but the joint is often prone to considerable abrasive wear

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverotation capabilityVSAvoidwear resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The resilient element (spring or rubber) is designed as a replaceable component that absorbs wear and degradation. Instead of protecting a complex pinned joint, the simple resilient element is easily replaced when worn, maintaining reliability at low cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Solution Approach 2:

The mechanical pinned joint system is replaced with a resilient element that provides rotation capability through elastic deformation rather than mechanical joint movement. This eliminates the abrasive wear associated with pinned joints while maintaining the necessary adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Strength

If silentblocks with axial clearance are used for resilient mounting, then the tool can move resiliently, but the seating is unstable and the tool constantly moves

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresilient mountingVSAvoidseating stability
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The resilient element is designed with specific local properties: it provides clearance and movement capability in the vertical direction for shock absorption, while maintaining rigid seating and stable positioning in horizontal directions. This directional differentiation resolves the contradiction between resilient mounting and seating stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Provides stable, accurate, and cost-effective guidance of the work tool with reduced wear and maintenance, extending the service life of components and maintaining consistent working angles.

Implementation Method 1

at least two resilient sealing rings in an anti-slip manner are arranged at the edges of the cavity

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

there is an oil fill arranged between the sealing rings inside the cavity of the tube

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLubrication: Lubrication

Implementation Method 3

a compression spring for swing absorption

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentEP4436353B1An agricultural machine comprising a device to protect a work tool
Publication Date: 2025.08.06 FARMET
  • EP4436353B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4436353B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4436353B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A device to protect a work tool of an agricultural machine, especially a device to protect a work tool (1) of a soil cultivator against overload when hitting an obstacle, containing a swinging mounting (2) arranged in connection between the load-bearing frame (4) of the machine and the work tool (1), where the work tool (1) is attached to a tube (5) in the cavity (8) of which there is a shaft (7) fixed in the load-bearing frame (4) and, at the edges of the cavity (8), at least two resilient sealing rings (9) are arranged in an anti-slip manner, and between the rings (9), inside the cavity (8) of the tube (5), oil fill (10) is arranged.