Collaboration Work Unit Approval State Segmentation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing collaboration environments lack effective mechanisms to manage and track the approval states of units of work, leading to ambiguity and inefficiency in review cycles and progress recording.

Innovation Solution

A system configured to facilitate user engagement with units of work by allowing users to specify approval states such as approved, revise, rejected, and pending approval, which updates the work unit records and triggers corresponding actions, such as generating new units of work for revisions or resetting status.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If a simple complete/incomplete status system is used, then the system is easy to operate, but it lacks precision in characterizing approval states

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveapproval state characterization precisionVSAvoidstatus system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the approval state characterization into multiple distinct states (approved, rejected, pending approval, revise) rather than using a single binary status. This segmentation allows precise tracking of different approval scenarios while maintaining a structured system through defined transitions between states.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements dynamic state transitions where units of work can move between different approval states based on user actions. The system dynamically adjusts the status based on the current state and user input, allowing flexible progression through approval workflows while maintaining systematic control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Loss of information

If multiple approval states are implemented, then progress recordation is enhanced, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprogress information completenessVSAvoidapproval management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms where each approval state provides information about the current status and required actions. The system feeds back to users what state a unit of work is in and what actions are needed to progress, reducing the perceived complexity by providing clear guidance while maintaining comprehensive progress tracking.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent establishes predefined state transitions and rules for moving between approval states. By establishing these rules in advance (preliminarily), the system reduces operational complexity during use, as users and the system know the expected progression paths without needing to make ad-hoc decisions about state management.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Productivity

If automated actions are triggered by approval states, then productivity is improved, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereview cycle efficiencyVSAvoidautomation mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements self-service automation where the system automatically performs actions based on the current approval state without requiring manual intervention for each transition. For example, when a unit of work is marked as approved, the system automatically updates related units or triggers notifications, improving productivity while keeping the automation rules simple and state-driven.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS20250190946A1Systems and methods to facilitate user engagement with units of work assigned within a collaboration environment
Publication Date: 2025.06.12 ASANA INC
  • US20250190946A1 patent drawing
  • US20250190946A1 patent drawing
  • US20250190946A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for facilitating user engagement with units of work assigned within a collaboration environment are presented herein. Implementations may: manage environment state information maintaining a collaboration environment, the environment state information the work unit records including values of an approval state parameter; effectuate presentation of a user interface of the collaboration environment, the user interface displaying individual work unit pages for individual units of work that include a set of user interface elements available for selection by the users, individual user interface elements in the set corresponding to different ones of the values of the approval state parameter; obtain user input information conveying user input characterizing the selection of the individual user interface elements; update the work unit records based on the user input information; and/or other perform other operations.