Work Unit Characterization for Direct and Indirect Objective Progress

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing collaboration environments lack the ability to effectively track and manage business objectives independently from the completion of specific tasks, leading to misalignment between project outcomes and organizational goals.

Innovation Solution

A system and method to characterize units of work based on business objectives, utilizing environment state information to associate tasks with objectives, monitor progress indirectly or directly, and update records accordingly, allowing for a clearer view of objective fulfillment.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If business objectives are tracked directly through task completion, then task management is simplified, but the ability to capture indirect contributions and nuanced progress toward objectives is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetask managementVSAvoidprogress information
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the relationship between tasks and objectives by introducing intermediate progress records that separately track direct and indirect contributions. Tasks are segmented into those that directly advance objectives and those that indirectly support them, allowing nuanced tracking without complicating task management.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces progress records as an intermediary layer between tasks and objectives. These records capture the nuanced relationship where task completion may indirectly facilitate objective fulfillment through independent actions. The intermediary progress records preserve information about indirect contributions while maintaining simple task tracking.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Productivity

If progress is updated based on task completion status, then tracking is straightforward, but misalignment between project outcomes and organizational goals occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetracking efficiencyVSAvoidobjective alignment
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback loops where progress records are continuously updated based on both task completion status and objective fulfillment status. This feedback mechanism allows the system to detect misalignment between task outcomes and organizational goals, enabling corrective actions to maintain reliability of objective tracking.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent makes the progress tracking dynamic by allowing the relationship between tasks and objectives to evolve. Progress records can be updated to reflect changing circumstances where task completion may or may not lead to objective fulfillment, enabling the system to adapt to real-world complexities while maintaining efficient tracking.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Productivity

If all units of work are required to directly contribute to business objectives, then resource allocation is optimized, but flexibility to accommodate supporting activities is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresource allocationVSAvoidwork flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by allowing different types of work units to have different relationships with objectives. Some units of work directly contribute to objectives while others indirectly support them through facilitating independent actions. This local differentiation optimizes resource allocation for direct contributions while preserving flexibility for supporting activities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system allows for partial action where not all units of work need to directly advance objectives. Indirect contributors are permitted to support objectives through facilitating independent actions, providing the flexibility needed for supporting activities while still maintaining overall progress toward organizational goals.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS12393894B2Systems and methods to characterize units of work based on business objectives
Publication Date: 2025.08.19 ASANA INC
  • US12393894B2 patent drawing
  • US12393894B2 patent drawing
  • US12393894B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for units of work based on business objectives are disclosed. Exemplary implementations may: manage environment state information maintaining a collaboration environment configured to facilitate interaction by users, the environment state information defining units of work and business objectives associated with the units of work; obtain progress information, the progress information for individual business objectives conveying progress toward fulfillment of the individual business objectives; update objective records for the business objectives based on the progress information so that the progress of the business objectives is maintained by the objective records; and/or perform other operations.