Work Vehicle Obstacle Response Control for Safe Automatic Travel

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional automatic traveling systems for work vehicles face a trade-off between safety and efficiency, as they either stop completely upon obstacle detection, reducing efficiency, or continue traveling, compromising safety.

Innovation Solution

An automatic traveling system that includes an imaging system to detect obstacles, allowing for a traveling stop or continuation instruction based on obstacle detection, thereby balancing safety and efficiency by enabling controlled navigation around detected obstacles.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If automatic traveling is stopped upon obstacle detection, then safety is improved, but work efficiency is lowered

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoidwork efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts the automatic traveling behavior based on the type of obstacle detected. For movable obstacles, the system continues traveling to maintain efficiency, while for immovable obstacles, it stops to ensure safety. This dynamic response resolves the contradiction between safety and work efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the operational parameter (traveling state) based on obstacle characteristics. By detecting whether an obstacle is movable or immovable, the system switches between two operational modes: continuing travel for movable obstacles and stopping for immovable obstacles, thus balancing safety and efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If automatic traveling is continued upon obstacle detection, then work efficiency is maintained, but safety is compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvework efficiencyVSAvoidsafety
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically determines the appropriate response based on real-time obstacle detection results. By classifying obstacles as movable or immovable, the system adaptively selects whether to continue or stop traveling, maintaining efficiency when safe and ensuring safety when necessary.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The operational parameter (traveling continuation or stop) is changed based on the detected obstacle type. The system transitions between different operational states according to whether the obstacle can be moved, thereby resolving the safety-efficiency trade-off.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If uniform stopping is applied upon obstacle detection, then safety is ensured, but work efficiency is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoidwork efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies different stopping behaviors to different types of obstacles rather than uniformly stopping for all obstacles. Movable obstacles receive a different response (continue traveling) compared to immovable obstacles (stop traveling), optimizing the balance between safety and efficiency for each specific case.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system transitions from a static uniform stopping policy to a dynamic differentiated response policy. By continuously monitoring obstacle characteristics and adjusting the traveling response accordingly, the system achieves both safety and efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system effectively prevents efficiency loss while ensuring the safety of the work vehicle by allowing controlled navigation around detected obstacles, thus maintaining operational continuity.

Implementation Method 1

an acquisition processing part acquiring a captured image from an imaging part installed on the work vehicle

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectImage capture: Photography

Data Source

PatentUS12487611B2Automatic traveling system, automatic traveling method, and automatic traveling program
Publication Date: 2025.12.02 YANMAR HLDG CO LTD
  • US12487611B2 patent drawing
  • US12487611B2 patent drawing
  • US12487611B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An acquisition processing part acquires a captured image from a camera which is installed on a work vehicle. A detection processing part detects an obstacle on the basis of the captured image which is acquired by the acquisition processing part. When an obstacle is detected by the detection processing part, a reception processing part receives a traveling stop instruction for stopping automatic traveling of the work vehicle or a traveling continuation instruction for continuing automatic traveling of the work vehicle. A traveling processing part stops the automatic traveling of the work vehicle when the reception processing part receives the traveling stop instruction, and continues the automatic traveling of the work vehicle when the reception processing part receives the traveling continuation instruction.