Work Vehicle Power System Low Carbon Fuel Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Heavy work vehicles rely on internal combustion engines that use fossil fuels, leading to undesirable emissions and inefficiencies, particularly when operating with traditional diesel engines.

Innovation Solution

A power system for work vehicles that utilizes a blend of low carbon fuels such as methanol, ethanol, methane, and hydrogen, along with a controller that implements feedforward and feedback control strategies to optimize combustion and emissions based on real-time sensor data.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If fossil fuels are used in internal combustion engines, then desired efficiency and performance characteristics are achieved, but undesirable emissions are generated

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveengine efficiencyVSAvoidemissions
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the chemical composition parameters of the fuel by using low carbon fuel blends (methanol, ethanol, methane, hydrogen) instead of traditional fossil fuels. This parameter change reduces carbon emissions while the control system adjusts operating parameters to maintain engine efficiency and performance characteristics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements a feedback control system using exhaust sensors to monitor emissions and operational conditions. The controller receives feedback from these sensors and dynamically adjusts operating parameters to optimize the balance between engine performance and emissions reduction, ensuring that low carbon fuel blends operate at peak efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Object-generated harmful factors

If low carbon fuel blends are used, then emissions are reduced, but engine performance and combustion optimization become more complex

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveemissionsVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The controller serves multiple functions: it receives initial fuel composition indications, implements feedforward adjustments based on fuel type, receives feedback from exhaust sensors, and dynamically adjusts operating parameters. This multi-functional approach consolidates the complexity into a single control unit that manages emissions reduction while optimizing engine performance across different low carbon fuel blends.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary actions by receiving an initial indication of fuel blend composition and implementing feedforward adjustments before combustion occurs. This proactive approach prepares the control system with anticipated fuel characteristics, allowing it to pre-adjust operating parameters and reduce the complexity of real-time adjustments during combustion.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Productivity

If feedforward and feedback control strategies are implemented, then combustion and emissions are optimized, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefuel efficiencyVSAvoidcontrol mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The feedforward control strategy performs preliminary adjustments by receiving initial fuel composition indications and pre-adjusting operating parameters before combustion. This proactive preparation optimizes combustion for the specific fuel blend type, improving fuel efficiency while distributing the control complexity across predictable, pre-planned adjustments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The feedback control strategy uses exhaust sensors to monitor actual combustion results and operational conditions, then dynamically adjusts operating parameters to optimize fuel efficiency and emissions. This closed-loop approach refines the combustion process in real-time, achieving high fuel efficiency while the controller integrates both feedforward and feedback mechanisms into a unified control system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The use of low carbon fuel blends in work vehicle power systems reduces emissions, improves fuel efficiency, and enhances engine performance by dynamically adjusting operating parameters based on fuel composition and operational conditions.

Implementation Method 1

receive feedback from the at least one exhaust sensor regarding operational conditions; and adjust the operating parameters based on the feedback from the at least one exhaust sensor

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFeedback control: Feedback

Implementation Method 2

the at least one fuel sensor is a density sensor

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDensity measurement: Density Gradient

Implementation Method 3

the at least one fuel sensor is a conductivity sensor

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectConductivity measurement: Conduction (electrical)

Implementation Method 4

an engine including a plurality of piston-cylinder sets configured to receive, ignite, and combust a mixture of the charge air and the low carbon fuel blend

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCombustion: Combustion

Data Source

PatentUS12270354B2Work vehicle power system with low carbon fuel blends
Publication Date: 2025.04.08 DEERE & CO
  • US12270354B2 patent drawing
  • US12270354B2 patent drawing
  • US12270354B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A power system for a work vehicle includes an intake arrangement for intake of charge air; a fuel arrangement including a fuel tank storing a low carbon fuel blend; an engine configured to receive, ignite, and combust a mixture of the charge air and the low carbon fuel blend; an exhaust arrangement positioned downstream to receive exhaust from the engine during combustion of the low carbon fuel blend; at least one exhaust sensor positioned at or proximate to the exhaust arrangement; and a controller. The controller is configured to receive an initial indication of a composition of the low carbon fuel blend; implement operating parameters with feedforward adjustments based on the initial indication of the composition of the low carbon fuel blend; receive feedback from the at least one exhaust sensor regarding operational conditions; and adjust the operating parameters based on the feedback.