Worker Agent Ranking and Clustering for Cross-Platform AI Tasks

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional AI systems are siloed and lack interoperability, leading to inefficiencies, redundancies, and security vulnerabilities, and fail to effectively identify and execute tasks across multiple platforms.

Innovation Solution

A decentralized network protocol for AI agents that enables platform-agnostic selection and execution of AI agents, utilizing a core node for agent ranking, clustering, and dynamic task decomposition, ensuring seamless interaction and tailored responses.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If conventional AI systems operate in siloed platforms, then each platform can maintain its own functionality, but interoperability between platforms is lost and inefficiencies arise

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveinteroperabilityVSAvoidsystem integration
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments AI agents into distinct worker agents that can be independently selected and executed across different platforms. Each worker agent operates as an independent unit with standardized interfaces, enabling interoperability without requiring integration of entire platforms. The core node coordinates these segmented agents, allowing flexible composition across siloed environments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The core node serves as an intermediary between user agents and worker agents across different platforms. It receives requests from user agents, identifies tasks, selects appropriate worker agents from available platforms, and coordinates execution. This intermediary layer abstracts the complexity of platform differences and enables seamless interoperability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Adaptability or versatility

If multiple AI platforms are used, then functionality and capabilities increase, but redundancies and security vulnerabilities increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovefunctionalityVSAvoidsecurity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system creates a universal framework where worker agents from different platforms can be selected and executed through standardized protocols. The core node provides universal task identification, agent selection, and coordination functionality that works across all platforms, reducing the need for platform-specific integration code and security measures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback mechanisms where the core node monitors worker agent performance and availability statuses. This feedback allows the system to detect and respond to security issues, remove compromised agents from the pool, and maintain trust across multiple platforms while preserving their functional diversity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Productivity

If AI agents are selected based on availability and relevance, then task execution efficiency improves, but the complexity of ranking and clustering agents increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetask execution efficiencyVSAvoidagent ranking system
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically updates availability statuses and relevance scores of worker agents based on real-time conditions. The core node continuously monitors agent status and adjusts rankings accordingly, allowing efficient task allocation that adapts to changing conditions without requiring complex static evaluation frameworks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses measurable parameters such as availability status, relevance scores, and drift metrics to rank agents. By transforming complex agent evaluations into these concrete parameters, the ranking system becomes more manageable and scalable. The core node processes these parameters systematically to produce efficient agent selections.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS12407510B2Methods and systems for ranking a plurality of worker agents based on a user request
Publication Date: 2025.09.02 PORTAL AI INC
  • US12407510B2 patent drawing
  • US12407510B2 patent drawing
  • US12407510B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for identifying and clustering worker agents for processing requests includes receiving, by a core node, from a user agent, a user request. The core node updates, for each of the plurality of worker agents, an availability status, thereby producing a plurality of availability statuses. The core node computes, for each of the plurality of worker agents, a value of a drift metric. The core node clusters the plurality of worker agents to produce a plurality of clusters of worker agents, wherein each of the plurality of clusters contains worker agents that have similar semantic capabilities. Based at least on the user request, the plurality of availability statuses, and the plurality of clusters, the core node identifies a subset of the plurality of worker agents that are both available to process the user request and that are suitable for processing the user request.