Worker Dispatch System for Manufacturing Floor Route Optimization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Manufacturing environments face inefficiencies due to frequent changes in product demand and production types, leading to resource re-organization and worker adaptation challenges, with existing manual parts pick-up lists being non-optimal and time-consuming.

Innovation Solution

An AI-driven method leveraging frequent pattern mining and the Travelling Salesman Algorithm for generating optimized automated parts pick-up lists and routes, incorporating domain knowledge and real-time adaptive decision-making through interactive visualization.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If manual parts pick-up lists are used with random order and non-fixed routes, then workers have flexibility in picking parts, but total travel distance increases and manufacturing efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing efficiencyVSAvoidtotal travel distance
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary optimization by determining the optimal pick-up sequence and route before workers begin their tasks. The lot ordering module pre-calculates the sequence in which lots should be picked up, and the route optimization module pre-determines the optimal path, eliminating the need for workers to make decisions during execution and minimizing travel distance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms where the optimization algorithm considers worker positions, current tasks, and historical data to continuously improve route recommendations. The interface provides real-time feedback to workers about their current route efficiency and allows managers to monitor and adjust routes based on actual performance data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Adaptability or versatility

If frequent changes in product demand and production types occur, then manufacturing adaptability improves, but resource re-organization cost and worker adaptation time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing adaptabilityVSAvoidworker adaptation time
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system is designed to be dynamic and adaptable to changing production requirements. The lot ordering and route optimization modules can be re-executed with new parameters whenever product demand or production types change, automatically generating updated pick-up sequences and routes without requiring physical re-organization of resources or extensive worker retraining.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system handles changes by modifying operational parameters (pick-up sequences, routes, schedules) rather than physical resources. When product demand or production types change, the system adjusts the parameters of existing lots and routes through software configuration, avoiding the need for physical resource re-organization and minimizing worker adaptation time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If manual lot ordering and route assignment are used, then implementation simplicity is maintained, but optimization accuracy and scheduling precision decrease

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvescheduling precisionVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system introduces an intermediary optimization layer between manual input and execution. The lot ordering module and route optimization module act as intermediaries that take simple manual inputs (lots to be picked up, worker assignments) and automatically generate optimized sequences and routes, achieving high scheduling precision without requiring complex manual planning procedures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The optimization system performs self-service by automatically determining optimal pick-up sequences and routes without requiring manual intervention for each calculation. The algorithm independently analyzes the production requirements, worker capabilities, and route constraints to generate optimized schedules, reducing the complexity burden on users while maintaining high precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS11113638B2Optimized parts pickup list and routes for efficient manufacturing using frequent pattern mining and visualization
Publication Date: 2021.09.07 FUJIFILM BUSINESS INNOVATION CORP
  • US11113638B2 patent drawing
  • US11113638B2 patent drawing
  • US11113638B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Example implementations described herein are directed to an interface for a worker dispatch system configured to dispatch routes and schedules for workers on a manufacturing floor. Example implementations can involve a system configured to execute a lot ordering and route optimization for each of a plurality of workers; determine rack placement of the plurality of racks and total travel distance for each worker; generate a deployment plan for each worker from the lot ordering, the route optimization, the rack placement, and the total travel distance, the deployment plan involving a pick-up route and a schedule for each worker; provide the deployment plan to an interface configured to receive modifications to the deployment plan; and upon receiving instructions to deploy the deployment plan through the interface, provide the deployment plan to a device of each worker.