Worker Group Identification for Accurate Crowdsourcing
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Crowdsourcing techniques face challenges in achieving accurate labeling due to non-expert workers providing both correct and incorrect labels, leading to inconsistent judgments that require combining to produce a single label, which can decrease accuracy.
Innovation Solution
A method to identify a target worker group by detecting characteristics and attributes of workers that provide responses with accuracy above a threshold value, using either a top-down or bottom-up technique, and sending additional tasks to this group to improve the accuracy of crowd-sourced results.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Quantity of substance
If judgments from multiple non-expert workers are combined to produce a single label, then the quantity of labels increases, but the accuracy decreases due to inconsistent judgments
Solution Approach 1:
The patent segments the worker population into different groups based on their characteristics and performance. By dividing workers into segments (e.g., high-performing vs. low-performing workers), the system can selectively combine judgments from specific segments rather than all workers, thereby maintaining accuracy while still achieving quantity through parallel processing across multiple worker groups.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent applies local quality by treating different worker groups differently based on their demonstrated capabilities. High-performing workers receive more weight or their judgments are prioritized in the aggregation process, while lower-performing workers contribute less. This differential treatment based on local worker quality maintains overall label accuracy even as the quantity of labels increases through crowdsourcing.
2Productivity
If all workers are used to provide labels, then the productivity increases, but the reliability of labels decreases due to non-expert judgments
Solution Approach 1:
The patent performs preliminary action by evaluating and characterizing workers before they participate in the main labeling task. Through initial assessments, performance metrics, and characteristic detection, the system pre-identifies high-performing workers who will be relied upon for critical labeling decisions. This preliminary sorting ensures that when productivity is increased by engaging many workers, the reliability is maintained through selective use of pre-identified competent workers.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent changes parameters by dynamically adjusting the weight, influence, or selection criteria for different workers based on their measured characteristics and performance history. Workers with higher accuracy metrics, appropriate expertise attributes, or better performance on test items receive higher parameter values in the aggregation function, allowing the system to maintain reliability while scaling productivity by incorporating more workers with varying parameter weights.
Data Source
AI summary
Various techniques for identifying a target worker group are described herein. In one example, a method includes detecting a response to a task from each worker in a group of workers and detecting a set of characteristics that correspond to each worker, wherein each characteristic comprises at least one attribute. The method can also include detecting a first attribute that corresponds to workers that provide responses with an accuracy above a threshold value. Furthermore, the method can include identifying the target worker group, the target worker group comprising the workers corresponding to the detected first attribute. The method may also include sending an additional task to the target worker group.


