Worker Motion Evaluation Apparatus Using Expert Reference Comparison

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current information processing systems lack an effective method to evaluate and quantify the development of workers based on their motion patterns over time, particularly in comparison to expert standards, which is crucial for skill assessment and development monitoring.

Innovation Solution

An information processing apparatus that acquires time-series evaluation values of worker motions and reference evaluation values from experts, calculates motion levels indicating similarity, and outputs a development degree, utilizing cameras and microphones to detect various motion parameters, including facial expressions, voice analysis, and biometric data, to determine development stages and work skills.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If motion evaluation systems are introduced to assess worker skills, then skill assessment capability is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveskill assessment accuracyVSAvoidevaluation system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The evaluation system is segmented into distinct functional modules: an acquisition section for collecting motion data, a calculation section for processing evaluation values, and an output section for presenting results. This modular segmentation allows each component to perform a specific function, improving measurement precision while managing system complexity through organized functional divisions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The information processing apparatus is designed with multi-functionality, serving as a universal evaluation system that can assess various worker skills across different tasks. The system collects diverse motion data (position, orientation, acceleration) and processes it through unified calculation algorithms, enabling broad skill assessment capability without requiring separate specialized systems for each skill type.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Measurement precision

If multiple motion parameters are collected to improve evaluation accuracy, then measurement precision is improved, but information processing load increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemotion evaluation accuracyVSAvoiddata processing efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts only the essential motion parameters needed for skill assessment from the raw sensor data. The acquisition section collects position, orientation, and acceleration information, while the calculation section extracts key evaluation values from these parameters. This extraction process maintains measurement precision by focusing on relevant data while reducing processing load by eliminating unnecessary information.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

Motion data is collected and pre-processed in advance through the acquisition section before being passed to the calculation section. The system preliminarily organizes raw sensor data into structured motion parameters (position, orientation, acceleration), preparing the information for efficient subsequent analysis. This preliminary action reduces the processing burden on the calculation section while preserving all necessary evaluation information.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS11295459B2Information processing apparatus
Publication Date: 2022.04.05 FUJIFILM BUSINESS INNOVATION CORP
  • US11295459B2 patent drawing
  • US11295459B2 patent drawing
  • US11295459B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An information processing apparatus includes an acquisition section that acquires at least two first evaluation values obtained by evaluating a motion of a worker in time series and a reference evaluation value obtained by evaluating a motion of an expert as an exemplar of the worker, a calculation section that calculates at least two motion levels indicating similarity between the at least two first evaluation values and the reference evaluation value, and an output section that outputs a development degree indicating a degree of development of the worker based on the at least two motion levels.