Workflow Automation Framework for Oilfield Operations

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Hydrocarbon production operations face inefficiencies due to repetitive, manually intensive workflows that require significant time and expertise, leading to inconsistencies and missed opportunities for additional analysis, and existing automation solutions lack a flexible framework for adaptive and synergistic workflows.

Innovation Solution

A flexible workflow framework that automates routine executions between multiple participants, provides a common operating environment for consistent workflow execution, and allows substitution of applications and introduction of additional steps, utilizing Monte-Carlo analysis and petrotechnical models to optimize oilfield operations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If manual or semi-manual workflows are used, then flexibility and adaptability are maintained, but time consumption increases and consistency deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveworkflow execution speedVSAvoidautomation system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The workflow is divided into discrete, standardized steps that can be independently automated. Each step represents a specific task or decision point that can be handled by the automation system, allowing complex workflows to be broken down into manageable automated units.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The automation framework is designed to handle multiple workflow types and applications through a single unified platform. The system can accommodate various petrotechnical applications and workflow scenarios without requiring separate specialized systems, reducing overall complexity while maintaining versatility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Reliability

If standardized automated workflows are implemented, then consistency and reliability improve, but adaptability to different applications deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveworkflow execution consistencyVSAvoidworkflow adaptation flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The workflow framework incorporates dynamic elements that allow it to adapt to different applications and scenarios. The system can modify its behavior based on input data, conditions, and requirements, enabling standardized automation to accommodate diverse petrotechnical applications while maintaining consistency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system allows parameter changes and configuration adjustments to adapt workflows to different applications. By modifying parameters such as data formats, processing thresholds, and workflow steps, the same automated framework can serve multiple purposes without compromising reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Loss of time

If complex workflows are automated, then time consumption reduces, but ease of operation for non-expert users deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveengineer time on repetitive tasksVSAvoiduser interaction simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The framework introduces an intermediary layer between complex workflow logic and end users. This intermediary provides simplified interfaces and abstractions that allow non-expert users to interact with complex workflows without needing to understand the underlying complexity, reducing time loss while maintaining ease of operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The automation system performs self-service by executing complex workflows autonomously without requiring continuous user intervention. The system manages its own execution, error handling, and data processing, freeing users from manual operations while maintaining simple interaction through high-level interfaces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Extent of automation

If custom integration of disparate systems is performed, then workflow automation is achieved, but system complexity and integration difficulty increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveworkflow automation levelVSAvoidintegration framework complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The framework provides a universal integration platform that can connect disparate petrotechnical systems through standardized interfaces. This universal approach eliminates the need for custom integration solutions for each system combination, reducing integration complexity while achieving comprehensive workflow automation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces standardized intermediaries and connectors that facilitate integration between disparate applications. These intermediaries provide uniform communication protocols and data formats, simplifying the integration process and reducing the complexity of connecting multiple petrotechnical systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS9128693B2Systems and methods for workflow automation, adaptation and integration
Publication Date: 2015.09.08 LANDMARK GRAPHICS CORP
  • US9128693B2 patent drawing
  • US9128693B2 patent drawing
  • US9128693B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for implementing complex and disparate workflows, wherein a flexible framework (system architecture) is used for workflow automation, adaptation and integration.