Automated Workflow Compilation for Shared Instrument Scheduling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for synthesizing transcription activator-like effector nuclease (TALEN) pairs are inefficient, requiring separate vectors or lengthy subcloning procedures, limiting high-throughput construction and scalability in biological foundries.

Innovation Solution

A fully automated platform using a P2A self-cleavage sequence for one-step assembly of TALEN monomers onto a single vector, enabling the synthesis of 400 pairs of TALENs with over 96.2% success rate at a low material cost, facilitating genome-wide studies.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If separate vectors or subcloning procedures are used for synthesizing TALEN pairs, then traditional methods can be employed, but the synthesis process becomes inefficient and time-consuming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesynthesis efficiencyVSAvoidsynthesis time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines the synthesis of both TALEN monomers into a single vector system. The first and second TALEN monomers are synthesized in the same biological foundry using the same set of instruments and reagents, eliminating the need for separate vectors and subcloning procedures. This merging of synthesis operations directly improves productivity and reduces the time required to generate TALEN pairs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary synthesis of TALEN monomer libraries before final assembly. The biological foundry pre-synthesizes multiple TALEN monomers with different specificities and stores them as ready-to-use components. When a TALEN pair is needed, the system simply retrieves and combines pre-synthesized monomers rather than synthesizing them de novo, significantly reducing synthesis time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Productivity

If multiple processes share the same instrument in a biological foundry, then instrument utilization increases, but scheduling conflicts arise

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinstrument utilizationVSAvoidscheduling complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the TALEN synthesis process into distinct modular operations that can be scheduled independently. The biological foundry divides the synthesis of first and second TALEN monomers into separate workflow instances that can be executed in parallel or sequentially based on instrument availability. This segmentation allows the scheduling system to manage multiple processes sharing the same instruments without conflicts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a universal biological foundry platform that can execute multiple different TALEN synthesis workflows using the same set of instruments and reagents. The system is designed to handle diverse synthesis protocols (e.g., Golden Gate assembly, Gibson assembly) on the same equipment, maximizing instrument utilization while maintaining flexibility in scheduling different process types.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Extent of automation

If traditional TALEN synthesis methods are used, then established protocols can be followed, but the process requires significant human intervention and is not scalable

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomation levelVSAvoidprocess simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements self-service automation where the biological foundry system automatically manages the entire TALEN synthesis process without human intervention. The system autonomously selects appropriate TALEN monomers from libraries, schedules synthesis operations across multiple instruments, monitors progress, and assembles final TALEN pairs. The workflow includes automatic error handling and quality control, making the process fully scalable while maintaining simplicity through standardized automated protocols.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS20250004439A1Systems and methods for supporting multiple automated workflows
Publication Date: 2025.01.02 LIFEFOUNDRY INC
  • US20250004439A1 patent drawing
  • US20250004439A1 patent drawing
  • US20250004439A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for automated workflow include assigning a set of first targets to an uncompiled first workflow. The uncompiled first workflow specifies a first set of process modules. Each such module is associated with a subset of unit operations. Each unit operation includes a time interval and specifies an instrument. For each target in the set of first targets, the uncompiled workflow is translated into an instance of a compiled first workflow that includes a linear temporal order of unit operations. This translating resolves a logical condition of the uncompiled first workflow.