Information Processing System Workflow Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

User operations during a series of processes on a file can inadvertently cause failures in subsequent processes, as existing systems do not effectively manage or control user interactions that affect the execution of predetermined workflows.

Innovation Solution

An information processing system with processors that arrange request units for processes in sequence and exert control over user operations to prevent interference with subsequent processes, by prohibiting or notifying users of operations that could lead to failures and offering alternative actions to ensure smooth workflow execution.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If users are allowed to perform operations during a series of processes, then ease of operation is improved, but reliability deteriorates due to potential failures in subsequent processes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser operation freedomVSAvoidworkflow execution reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies preliminary anti-action by detecting user operations that may cause failures in subsequent processes before they occur. When a potential harmful operation is detected, the system proactively displays a warning message to the user, preventing the operation from causing workflow failure. This resolves the contradiction by maintaining user operation freedom while preventing reliability deterioration through advance intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

2Reliability

If the system controls user operations to prevent failures, then reliability is improved, but ease of operation deteriorates due to restrictions on user actions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveworkflow execution reliabilityVSAvoiduser operation freedom
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies dynamics by making the control mechanism adaptive rather than static. Instead of uniformly restricting all user operations, the system dynamically evaluates each user operation to determine if it may cause a failure in subsequent processes. Only operations that pose a risk are restricted with warning messages, while safe operations proceed without interference. This resolves the contradiction by improving reliability through targeted control while minimizing impact on ease of operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS20240330239A1Information processing system, non-transitory computer readable medium, and method
Publication Date: 2024.10.03 FUJIFILM BUSINESS INNOVATION CORP
  • US20240330239A1 patent drawing
  • US20240330239A1 patent drawing
  • US20240330239A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An information processing system includes one or more processors configured to: when a series of processes on a file are defined in advance, the series of processes including a first process and a second process, the second process being performed after execution of the first process, arrange a first request unit and a second request unit on a display unit in this sequence, the first request unit being used to request the first process, the second request unit being used to request the second process; and, after the first process is requested by using the first request unit, until the second process is requested by using the second request unit, exert control related to a user operation on the basis of the second process.