AI Project Workflow Evaluation for Multi-Actor Delay Prediction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Managing complex projects across multiple locations and stages is challenging due to the need for continuous monitoring and efficient tracking of progress to ensure timely completion, especially when multiple managers are involved.

Innovation Solution

A system and method that utilizes AI-assisted project management tools to divide projects into tasks, determine completion percentages based on actor parameters, estimate delays, and optimize project workflows for timely completion, while also selecting developers and providing feedback.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If multiple managers continuously monitor project status, then project tracking accuracy is improved, but management complexity and resource consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproject tracking accuracyVSAvoidmanagement complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides complex projects into smaller, manageable tasks and assigns them to different actors. Each task can be monitored independently, reducing the complexity of overall project tracking while maintaining accuracy through granular progress measurement at the task level rather than requiring continuous monitoring of the entire project by multiple managers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables automated progress tracking where actors update their own task completion status based on predefined parameters. This self-service mechanism eliminates the need for continuous manual monitoring by multiple managers, reducing management complexity while maintaining tracking accuracy through systematic data collection from task performers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Productivity

If projects are divided into tasks with multiple actors, then productivity is improved, but tracking and monitoring difficulty increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproject completion efficiencyVSAvoidprogress tracking difficulty
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements an automated feedback mechanism that collects progress data from multiple actors performing tasks. The system aggregates completion percentages from individual actors and feeds this information back to calculate overall project progress automatically. This eliminates the manual tracking difficulty while maintaining high productivity through efficient multi-actor task execution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates a universal progress tracking mechanism that works across diverse task types and actor combinations. A single standardized interface and calculation method handle progress aggregation regardless of the number of actors or task complexity, making tracking equally easy for simple or complex project structures while maintaining productivity benefits of task division.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Measurement precision

If completion percentage is calculated based on multiple actor parameters, then measurement accuracy is improved, but calculation complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompletion percentage accuracyVSAvoidcalculation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms multiple actor-specific parameters into a standardized completion percentage metric through systematic parameter transformation. Each actor's progress data is converted to a common scale and weighted according to their contribution, then aggregated into an overall completion percentage. This parameter transformation approach maintains measurement accuracy while reducing calculation complexity by establishing consistent conversion rules.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system discards raw, complex actor-specific progress data and recovers it in the form of simplified completion percentages. Individual actor parameters with varying units and scales are temporarily discarded in favor of normalized values, then recovered as meaningful completion metrics through weighted aggregation. This discarding and recovering process simplifies calculations while preserving measurement accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #34Discarding and recovering

Data Source

PatentUS20250371454A1Systems and methods for evaluating one or more projects
Publication Date: 2025.12.04 ENGINEER AI CORP
  • US20250371454A1 patent drawing
  • US20250371454A1 patent drawing
  • US20250371454A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for evaluating one or more projects. The system includes a processor coupled to a memory. The processor is configured to select one or more developers to complete the one or more projects based on one or more selection parameters. The processor is further configured to communicate to the one or more developers that are selected by the processor, a project workflow to complete the one or more projects. The project workflow is generated based on an optimization, by the processor, of one or more parameters for timely completing the projects. In addition, the processor is further configured to determine a release feedback of each project based on one or more parameters.