Workflow Graph Translation for Genomics Data Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current computational workflow systems face challenges in scalability, reproducibility, and efficiency due to their reliance on specific syntax and the need for extensive user annotation, leading to increased processing time and costs, particularly in handling complex genomics data analyses.

Innovation Solution

The system translates computational workflows into a graph format, allowing jobs to proceed based on intermediate results availability, enabling efficient execution without extensive user annotation, and supporting dynamic expressions and parallelization, thus optimizing workflow execution across diverse environments.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If computational workflows use specific syntax and require extensive user annotation to ensure reproducibility, then workflow reliability is improved, but processing time and device complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveworkflow reproducibilityVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a standardized graph representation (copy) of computational workflows that captures the essential execution logic without requiring detailed syntax annotations. This graph model serves as a universal representation that can be executed across different environments, providing reproducibility while reducing the time needed for workflow specification and execution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transforms workflow descriptions from syntax-heavy formats into a parameter-based graph structure where nodes represent computational steps and edges represent data dependencies. This parameterization approach maintains reproducibility by preserving execution logic while reducing processing overhead through standardized representation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If computational workflows are translated into graph format to enable parallelization and dynamic execution, then productivity is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveworkflow execution efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments computational workflows into discrete graph nodes representing individual computational steps, with edges representing data dependencies. This segmentation enables independent execution of nodes that have no dependencies, facilitating parallelization and improving productivity while maintaining manageable system complexity through modular structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements dynamic graph evaluation where the execution system can determine at runtime which nodes are ready for execution based on dependency satisfaction. This dynamic approach allows flexible parallelization and resource allocation, improving productivity without requiring complex static scheduling, thus balancing execution efficiency with system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Reliability

If computational workflows require extensive user annotation and specific syntax, then workflow reliability is improved, but ease of operation deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveworkflow reproducibilityVSAvoidworkflow portability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a universal graph representation that can execute the same computational workflow across different environments and platforms. This standardized format serves multiple functions: it preserves reproducibility through structured dependency tracking while simultaneously improving portability by eliminating environment-specific syntax requirements, thus enhancing ease of operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Productivity

If computational workflows are optimized for complex genomics data analysis, then productivity is improved, but loss of time increases due to extensive annotation requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata analysis throughputVSAvoidannotation time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary transformation of workflow descriptions into graph format before execution, capturing all necessary dependency information in advance. This preliminary action eliminates the need for extensive annotation during runtime, reducing the time loss associated with workflow specification while maintaining the productivity gains from optimized genomics data analysis through structured parallel execution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS11037345B2Systems and methods for processing computational workflows
Publication Date: 2021.06.15 SEVEN BRIDGES GENOMICS INC
  • US11037345B2 patent drawing
  • US11037345B2 patent drawing
  • US11037345B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In one embodiment, a method of processing a computational workflow comprises receiving a description of a computational workflow. The description comprises a plurality of steps, in which each step has at least one input and at least one output, and further wherein an input from a second step depends on an output from a first step. The description is translated into a static workflow graph stored in a memory, the static workflow graph comprising a plurality of nodes having input ports and output ports, wherein dependencies between inputs and outputs are specified as edges between input ports and output ports. Information about a first set of nodes is then extracted from the static workflow graph and placed into a dynamic graph. A first actionable job is identified from the dynamic graph and executed.