Workflow Impact Analysis Using Execution Trees for Targeted Testing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current software testing methodologies for workflows are inefficient, incomplete, and computationally expensive, failing to identify all potential impacts and anticipate comprehensive testing scenarios, particularly in identifying affected nodes and branches, and do not consider simulating realistic execution scenarios or monitoring code changes.

Innovation Solution

An automated impact analysis system that monitors code repositories for changes, simulates workflows in a virtual sandbox environment, constructs execution trees, and identifies potentially affected nodes and branches to recommend targeted test cases for execution, using a knowledge base to map relationships between test cases and execution trees.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If comprehensive software testing is performed to identify all potential impacts of code changes, then testing completeness is improved, but computational cost and time consumption increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetesting completenessVSAvoidcomputational time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the workflow into discrete nodes and branches, allowing impact analysis to focus only on affected segments rather than the entire workflow. This segmentation enables the system to identify and analyze only the portions of the workflow that may be impacted by code changes, reducing computational overhead while maintaining testing completeness for relevant areas.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary construction of execution trees and test case mappings before actual impact analysis occurs. By pre-establishing the relationships between workflow nodes, branches, and test cases, the system can quickly query and identify affected areas without performing comprehensive analysis during the testing phase, thus reducing computational time while ensuring thorough testing of impacted components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If traditional impact analysis methodologies are used to identify affected workflow components, then potential risks are identified, but the process remains computationally expensive and inefficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverisk identification accuracyVSAvoidanalysis efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces traditional mechanical impact analysis methodologies with an automated system that uses execution trees and pre-established mappings. Instead of manually or computationally intensive analysis of code dependencies, the system substitutes this with a structured approach using pre-built execution trees that map workflow nodes to test cases, dramatically improving analysis efficiency while maintaining accurate risk identification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a virtual representation (execution tree) of the workflow that copies and structures the actual workflow relationships. This copied structure allows for efficient analysis and query operations without directly manipulating the actual workflow or performing expensive computations on the real system, thereby improving productivity while preserving the accuracy of risk identification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Reliability

If all test cases are executed to ensure thorough testing, then testing coverage is improved, but resource consumption and execution time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetesting coverageVSAvoidresource consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the test case execution set based on identified impacted workflow nodes and branches. By dividing the full test suite into relevant and irrelevant portions, the system executes only those test cases that correspond to affected areas, maintaining comprehensive coverage of impacted functionality while reducing overall resource consumption by excluding unnecessary test executions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies partial action by executing only the necessary subset of test cases rather than the complete test suite. By identifying and executing only those test cases that are relevant to the code changes and impacted workflow areas, the system achieves sufficient testing coverage for the changes made without the excessive resource consumption of running all possible test cases.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS20250245133A1Workflow impact analysis
Publication Date: 2025.07.31 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION
  • US20250245133A1 patent drawing
  • US20250245133A1 patent drawing
  • US20250245133A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An embodiment monitors a code repository for changes made to source code. The embodiment detects a change made to the source code, and upon detecting the change made to the source code, identifies a potentially impacted workflow node of a workflow based on the change made to the source code. The embodiment identifies an execution tree of the workflow that contains the potentially impacted workflow node. The embodiment identifies a set of test cases corresponding to the execution tree. The embodiment generates a test case recommendation based on the set of test cases identified. The embodiment transmits the test case recommendation to a user device.