Workflow Mapping Refined by Reinforcement Feedback

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional systems struggle to provide a complete and understandable graphical depiction of complex workflows due to the use of static models that fail to leverage user knowledge and preferences, often resulting in unsatisfactory outputs.

Innovation Solution

A generative model adjusted through reinforcement learning based on user feedback is employed to iteratively refine graphical workflow depictions, incorporating natural language processing and generative adversarial networks to extract and arrange entities and actions, allowing for dynamic adjustments based on user input.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If a static generative model is used to create workflow depictions, then the system structure is simple, but the quality and user satisfaction of the output is poor

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequality of workflow depictionVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback loops where user interactions with the workflow depiction (such as modifications, corrections, or preferences) are captured and fed back to the generative model. This allows the model to learn from user behavior and improve subsequent workflow depictions, directly addressing the quality issue while managing complexity through iterative refinement rather than complete system redesign.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system transitions from a static generative model to a dynamic one that adapts based on user feedback. The model's parameters and structure can evolve over time, allowing it to improve workflow depiction quality. This dynamic approach resolves the contradiction by making the system flexible and responsive without requiring complete structural overhaul.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Adaptability or versatility

If a static model is used, then the system is easy to operate, but it cannot adapt to user preferences and feedback

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to user preferencesVSAvoidsystem operability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The generative model is designed to automatically learn and adapt from user feedback without requiring manual reconfiguration or complex user intervention. The system self-adjusts its parameters and behavior based on observed user preferences, maintaining ease of operation while achieving adaptability. Users simply interact naturally with the workflow depictions, and the system autonomously improves.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Manufacturing precision

If reinforcement learning is implemented to improve workflow depictions, then the quality of output increases, but the training time and computational resources increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequality of workflow depictionVSAvoidtraining time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements reinforcement learning in a phased manner, starting with partial implementation on key components of the workflow generation process. Rather than training the entire system simultaneously, critical elements are optimized first, delivering quality improvements sooner. This incremental approach reduces initial training time while still achieving significant quality gains.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary training and pre-computation of common workflow patterns before actual use. By pre-learning frequent scenarios and establishing baseline performance, the system reduces the computational burden and time required during interactive refinement phases. This preliminary action allows faster adaptation to specific user needs while maintaining high output quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS12608643B2Generating workflow representations using reinforced feedback analysis
Publication Date: 2026.04.21 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION
  • US12608643B2 patent drawing
  • US12608643B2 patent drawing
  • US12608643B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Generating visual workflow representations by receiving data including text instructions, identifying actions in the instructions, generating a mapping of the actions according to a generative model, the mapping including an action sequence, providing the mapping to a user, receiving feedback from the user, altering the generative model according to the feedback, and generating a revised mapping according to the feedback.