Workflow Prioritization Models for Task Ranking Accuracy

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Collaboration environments often face inefficiencies in determining how to prioritize units of work, leading to potential misallocation of resources and reduced user productivity.

Innovation Solution

A system utilizing machine learning to generate prioritization models based on user and work unit parameters, user input, and neural networks to predict workflow prioritizations, providing graphical user interfaces for priority indications.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If users manually determine prioritization of units of work, then users have control over task priorities, but user efficiency decreases and time is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser efficiencyVSAvoidtime spent determining priorities
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically generates prioritization models and determines task priorities without requiring user intervention. The machine learning model self-services by analyzing work unit parameters, user parameters, and contextual information to autonomously establish priority rankings, freeing users from manual prioritization tasks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The manual mechanical process of users thinking about and deciding priorities is replaced with an automated computational system. The machine learning model processes data and generates prioritization recommendations algorithmically, substituting human cognitive effort with automated intelligence.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Measurement precision

If users manually prioritize units of work, then prioritization can be adjusted based on intuition, but accuracy of prioritization decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of prioritizationVSAvoidcomplexity of prioritization system
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system transforms qualitative intuitive judgments into quantitative parameter-based analysis. By analyzing multiple parameters including work unit characteristics, user context, dependencies, and resource availability, the model achieves more precise and objective prioritization decisions compared to subjective manual assessment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The machine learning model acts as an intermediary between raw work data and prioritization decisions. It processes and synthesizes multiple data sources and parameters, providing a bridge that translates complex information into actionable priority recommendations with higher accuracy than direct human judgment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Productivity

If machine learning models are used to determine prioritization, then accuracy and efficiency improve, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveworkflow efficiencyVSAvoidcomplexity of machine learning system
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The machine learning system is designed to handle multiple functions within a unified framework. It can process different types of work units, accommodate various user roles, analyze diverse parameters, and generate prioritization recommendations across different contexts, reducing the need for separate specialized systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary analysis and model generation in advance. Prioritization models are pre-computed based on available data, and the system continuously learns and updates from historical patterns, so that when prioritization decisions are needed, the heavy computational lifting has already been done, reducing real-time complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS12493843B2Systems and methods for generating prioritization models and predicting workflow prioritizations
Publication Date: 2025.12.09 ASANA INC
  • US12493843B2 patent drawing
  • US12493843B2 patent drawing
  • US12493843B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for generating prioritization models and predicting workflow prioritizations are disclosed. Exemplary implementations may: manage environment state information maintaining a collaboration environment; effectuate presentation of a series of questions via a first client computing platform associated with the first user; receive user input from the first client computing platform; generate a first prioritization model based on the response information; and determine one or more priorities for the first user based on the first prioritization model such that a primary first unit of work within the first set of units of work is determined to be a higher priority than a secondary first unit of work within the first set of units of work.