Workflow Management Server for Remote Content Review

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The complexity and error-proneness of workflows for reviewing electronic content, such as images and videos, across multiple reviewers located remotely, necessitate a streamlined process for efficient collaboration and communication.

Innovation Solution

A graphical user interface (GUI) and client-server network system that allows seamless review and commenting on electronic content, enabling reviewers to associate comments with snapshots or video clips, and facilitating communication through a workflow management server, which supports standardized review panels across various devices and platforms.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If electronic content is transported among reviewers using traditional email or Internet processes, then reviewers can be located remotely, but the workflow becomes complex and error-prone

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveremote reviewer locationVSAvoidworkflow complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a workflow management server as an intermediary that centralizes the content review process. This server acts as a mediator between reviewers and editors, managing content transportation, reviewer assignment, and workflow coordination through a standardized interface, thereby reducing the complexity that arises from direct peer-to-peer communication and file exchanges

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The review panel application provides a universal platform that handles multiple functions including content display, comment submission, snapshot association, and workflow management through a single integrated interface. This multi-functional approach eliminates the need for multiple separate tools and processes, simplifying the overall workflow while supporting remote reviewers

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Reliability

If multiple reviewers and editors are involved in processing content, then comprehensive review is achieved, but the workflow becomes relatively long and complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereview completenessVSAvoidworkflow duration
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The workflow management server enables continuous processing by maintaining persistent connections and queues for content review tasks. As one reviewer completes their task, the system automatically and continuously moves the content to the next reviewer without interruption or manual intervention, eliminating idle time and maintaining continuous productive action throughout the review chain

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-configuring reviewer sequences, content routing rules, and review parameters before the actual review process begins. This advance preparation allows the workflow to proceed smoothly without delays for task assignment or configuration during the review process, reducing overall workflow duration

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Ease of operation

If reviewers manually manage content transportation and review coordination, then flexibility is maintained, but errors increase and efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanual control flexibilityVSAvoiderror rate
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements automated feedback mechanisms that notify reviewers and editors of workflow status, content availability, and task completion in real-time. This automated feedback loop replaces error-prone manual coordination while maintaining operational flexibility, as the system automatically adjusts content routing based on reviewer availability and task status without requiring manual intervention

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS8930843B2Electronic content workflow review process
Publication Date: 2015.01.06 ADOBE INC
  • US8930843B2 patent drawing
  • US8930843B2 patent drawing
  • US8930843B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Subject matter disclosed herein relates to a process for reviewing electronic content.