Workflow Management Platform Timeline Visualization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Enterprises face challenges in managing and scheduling multiple tasks across different scenarios, leading to difficulties in understanding which tasks have been performed, which are pending, and their dependencies, resulting in a time-consuming and error-prone process.

Innovation Solution

A workflow management system platform that accesses scenario and workflow databases to display tasks graphically on a timeline, allowing for intuitive scheduling adjustments and gap analysis, facilitating user interaction and schedule management.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If a list format is used to display task names and dates, then the system can handle a large number of tasks and scenarios, but the process becomes time-consuming and error-prone for users to understand task status and dependencies

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of tasksVSAvoiduser understanding of task status
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms the one-dimensional list view into a two-dimensional graphical timeline interface. Tasks are positioned along a horizontal time axis, with additional vertical layering for different scenarios. This dimensional transformation allows users to visually perceive task status, timing, and dependencies without increasing complexity, directly resolving the contradiction between handling many tasks and maintaining ease of understanding.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs color-coding to represent different task states (e.g., completed, pending, in-progress) and scenario types. Visual cues through color differentiation enable users to quickly grasp task status and priorities at a glance, eliminating the need to read through detailed text lists and reducing errors in understanding task dependencies.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #32Color changes

2Loss of information

If detailed task information is presented in text format, then all task parameters can be displayed, but making scheduling decisions becomes time-consuming and error-prone

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetask information completenessVSAvoidtime for scheduling decisions
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments task information into distinct visual components: timeline positioning shows scheduling time, graphical bars represent task duration, icons indicate task type, and connecting lines show dependencies. This segmentation allows all task parameters to be displayed simultaneously in an organized visual format, enabling rapid comprehension and decision-making without information loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system pre-calculates and pre-displays task dependencies, conflicts, and scheduling constraints in the graphical interface. Gap analysis is automatically performed and shown visually, so users don't need to manually analyze task relationships. This preliminary processing of information reduces the time required for scheduling decisions while maintaining complete task information.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If manual review of task lists is used, then users can see all task details, but understanding task dependencies and scheduling conflicts is difficult and error-prone

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of task schedulingVSAvoidinterface complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements automatic gap analysis that provides real-time feedback on scheduling conflicts and dependencies. When tasks are added or modified, the system immediately updates the graphical timeline to show conflicts, overlaps, or gaps visually. This automated feedback mechanism increases scheduling accuracy without requiring complex manual analysis from users.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The graphical timeline interface acts as an intermediary between the complex task data and the user. Instead of presenting raw data directly, the system translates task dependencies, timing, and conflicts into visual representations (bars, lines, colors) that are easier to interpret. This intermediary layer maintains reliability by accurately representing all task relationships while simplifying user interaction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS10474996B2Workflow management system platform
Publication Date: 2019.11.12 SAP SE
  • US10474996B2 patent drawing
  • US10474996B2 patent drawing
  • US10474996B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A workflow management system platform may access electronic data records in a scenario database, including, for each of a plurality of scenarios, a scenario identifier and a set of associated workflow identifiers. Electronic data records in a workflow database may also be accessed, including, for each of a plurality of workflows, a workflow identifier, a valid from date, a valid to date, and an order value. Some embodiments may then automatically display information about the plurality of scenarios. For example, for each workflow associated with a scenario, a workflow area may be displayed extending from a start location associated with the workflow's valid from date on the graphical timeline to an end location associated with the workflow's valid to date on the graphical timeline. According to some embodiments, workflow areas within a scenario may be presented in a sequence in accordance with order values.