Workforce Planning Knowledge Graph for Project Matching

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current workforce planning systems lack an efficient method to match new projects with previous projects based on timing, costs, and skills, leading to suboptimal resource allocation and increased costs.

Innovation Solution

A system generates a knowledge graph from historical project data, representing relationships between projects and skills, and uses semantic similarity metrics to identify matching previous projects for new ones, thereby determining the required personnel and generating a resource plan.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If workforce planning is performed without using knowledge graphs and semantic similarity metrics, then the process is simpler, but project matching accuracy and resource allocation efficiency deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproject matching accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-processing historical project data into structured knowledge graphs before actual project matching is needed. This includes extracting entities, relationships, and attributes from unstructured data, and pre-computing semantic similarity metrics, so that when a new project arrives, the matching process can quickly retrieve and compare against pre-organized knowledge without performing complex analysis in real-time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces knowledge graphs as an intermediary layer between raw historical project data and the project matching process. The knowledge graph serves as a mediator that transforms unstructured data into structured representations with defined schemas, entities, and relationships, enabling efficient semantic similarity computation without directly comparing raw data texts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Productivity

If manual methods are used to match projects and allocate resources, then the system is easier to implement, but productivity and scalability worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveworkforce planning efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual mechanical methods of project matching and resource allocation with automated computational systems. Instead of manually reviewing historical projects and assigning resources, the system uses natural language processing, knowledge graph construction, and semantic similarity algorithms to automatically match projects and recommend resource allocation, dramatically improving productivity and scalability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system transforms unstructured project data into structured parameters by extracting key attributes such as project description, skills required, timeline, budget, and outcomes. This parameterization enables systematic comparison and matching of projects based on quantifiable criteria rather than manual assessment, improving both efficiency and consistency in workforce planning.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If comprehensive historical data is analyzed for each new project, then matching accuracy improves, but the time and computational resources required increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveskill matching accuracyVSAvoidproject planning time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary analysis of historical project data by pre-processing and organizing it into knowledge graphs before actual project matching is needed. This includes pre-extracting entities, relationships, and attributes from unstructured data, and pre-computing semantic similarity metrics, so that when a new project arrives, the matching process can quickly retrieve and compare against pre-organized knowledge without performing complex analysis in real-time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the comprehensive historical data into structured components within the knowledge graph, including separate entities for projects, skills, resources, and relationships between them. This segmentation allows the system to efficiently query and compare specific attributes (such as skills required) without processing the entire historical dataset, reducing time and computational resources while maintaining matching accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS10699227B2Workforce strategy insights
Publication Date: 2020.06.30 ACCENTURE GLOBAL SOLUTIONS LTD
  • US10699227B2 patent drawing
  • US10699227B2 patent drawing
  • US10699227B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods, systems, and apparatus, including computer programs encoded on a computer storage medium, for workforce planning. The methods, systems, and apparatus include actions of obtaining historical project data describing previous projects, generating a knowledge graph based at least on the historical project data, obtaining future project data describing a future project, identifying a particular previous project that matches the future project based at least on the knowledge graph and the data describing the future project, generating similarity scores between the previous projects and the future project, determining that the similarity score between the particular previous project and the future project satisfies a similarity threshold, identifying the particular previous project as matching the future project, identifying personnel for the future project based at least on the skills needed for the particular previous project, and generating a resource plan for the future project based at least on the identified personnel.