Working Machine Control System for Automated Remote Switching

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing systems for operating multiple working machines lack efficiency in switching between automatic and remote control, making it difficult to select the appropriate machine for remote control, leading to potential work stoppages and reduced overall system efficiency.

Innovation Solution

A semi-automatic control system that includes a work progress calculating unit and a scheduled ending time calculating unit to determine which machine to switch from automatic to remote control, utilizing a centralized operation controller to transmit instructions and manage the transition.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Extent of automation

If automatic control is used for working machines, then labor cost is reduced and automation level is improved, but when the working machine stops, the system cannot respond quickly leading to work efficiency degradation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomatic control levelVSAvoidwork efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system dynamically switches between automatic control and remote control modes based on real-time monitoring of working machine status. When a machine is detected to be stopped or malfunctioning, the system automatically transitions from static automatic control to dynamic remote control, allowing operators to intervene and resume work, thereby maintaining high productivity while preserving automation benefits during normal operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements continuous feedback monitoring of working machine status including operation state, location, and performance metrics. This feedback mechanism enables the centralized operation controller to detect when automatic control fails or machines stop, triggering a switch to remote control mode. The feedback loop ensures rapid response to maintain work efficiency while preserving automation during successful operations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If remote control is switched to multiple working machines, then response to stoppages is improved, but without selection criteria it is difficult to constantly select the appropriate machine leading to system efficiency degradation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse to stoppageVSAvoidsystem efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system pre-establishes selection criteria and algorithms in the centralized operation controller that automatically identify which working machine should be switched to remote control based on monitored parameters such as stoppage duration, machine priority, work progress, and operator availability. This preliminary configuration enables immediate appropriate machine selection without manual decision-making, maintaining both high reliability and system efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables self-service through automated machine selection and control mode switching without requiring manual operator intervention for each decision. The centralized operation controller autonomously monitors all working machines, applies selection criteria, and switches appropriate machines to remote control mode, thereby maintaining high system efficiency while ensuring reliable response to stoppages

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Adaptability or versatility

If a centralized operation controller manages multiple working machines, then overall system coordination is improved, but without work progress calculation it is difficult to determine switching timing leading to work efficiency loss

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem coordinationVSAvoidwork efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system pre-calculates work progress metrics and establishes switching threshold criteria before operation begins. The centralized operation controller continuously compares real-time work progress against these pre-established thresholds to determine optimal switching timing from automatic to remote control. This preliminary preparation enables efficient decision-making that maintains both system coordination and work efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces manual judgment and mechanical decision-making with automated electronic calculation of work progress and switching timing. The centralized operation controller uses computational algorithms to continuously assess work progress metrics and automatically determine when to switch control modes, thereby achieving superior system coordination and work efficiency compared to manual methods

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS10214877B2Operation system of working machine
Publication Date: 2019.02.26 HITACHI LTD
  • US10214877B2 patent drawing
  • US10214877B2 patent drawing
  • US10214877B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention improves a work efficiency of an entire system for operating a plurality of working machines. An operation system of the working machine includes a work progress calculating unit 80 which calculates a work progress of a plurality of working machines or a scheduled ending time calculating unit 81 which calculates a scheduled ending time of a work by using the work progress calculated by the work progress calculating unit 80. A working machine of which an operation is switched from automatic control to remote control is determined from among the plurality of working machines by using the work progress or the scheduled ending time, and the operation system includes a centralized operation controller 43 which transmits an operation instruction to the determined working machine.