Multi-directional Workout Wheel Friction Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional fitness wheels for home use are limited to linear movement, making them inadequate for training diverse muscles and are complicated and cost-inefficient due to additional brake mechanisms required for multi-directional movement.

Innovation Solution

A multi-directional workout wheel device with a base frame, top cover, and multi-directional rotating members that adjust friction levels through dome structures and rotating balls, allowing for easy start and halt functionality without additional braking mechanisms.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If an independent brake mechanism is added to stop the fitness wheel, then the fitness wheel can be halted effectively, but the assembly becomes complicated and cost-inefficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehalting capabilityVSAvoidassembly complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the braking function with the existing dome structures and rotating members. The dome structures serve dual purposes: providing friction for forward movement and enabling halting when pressed against the rotating members. This eliminates the need for a separate brake mechanism, resolving the contradiction between halting capability and assembly complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The rotating members and dome structures are designed to perform multiple functions: they enable multi-directional movement, provide friction control, and serve as the braking mechanism. By making these components universal, the patent avoids adding dedicated brake parts, thus maintaining simplicity while achieving effective halting

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Reliability

If an independent brake mechanism is added to stop the fitness wheel, then the fitness wheel can be halted effectively, but the cost increases due to additional components

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehalting capabilityVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The braking function is merged into the existing dome structures and rotating members, eliminating the need to manufacture separate brake components. This reduces material costs, assembly costs, and overall manufacturing complexity while maintaining effective halting capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The existing structural components (dome structures and rotating members) serve the additional function of braking without requiring dedicated brake parts. The system uses what it already has to achieve the halting function, reducing manufacturing costs

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Adaptability or versatility

If the fitness wheel uses balls rotatable in multiple directions for multi-directional movement, then diverse muscle training is enabled, but the user needs one hand free for operating the brake mechanism

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemuscle training versatilityVSAvoidoperation convenience
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The braking function is merged with the existing dome structures that are already part of the multi-directional movement mechanism. Since the dome structures are always present and integrated into the movement system, no separate brake operation is needed, allowing users to maintain full hand control during exercise

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The halting function is achieved through the user's natural interaction with the dome structures during exercise. By pressing on the dome structures, users automatically engage the braking function without needing to operate a separate mechanism, making the system self-regulating and easier to operate

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Device complexity

If a fitness wheel is designed for linear gliding only, then the structure remains simple, but it is disadvantageous for training diverse muscles and becomes boring for daily uses

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural simplicityVSAvoidmuscle training versatility
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses spherical rotating members (balls) that can rotate in multiple directions, enabling the fitness wheel to move not only linearly but also in circular and diagonal patterns. This curvature-based design maintains structural simplicity while dramatically increasing exercise versatility

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

Solution Approach 2:

The rotating members are designed to be dynamically controllable, allowing users to switch between linear gliding and multi-directional movement by applying different forces. This dynamic capability enables the simple structure to adapt to various exercise requirements, enhancing muscle training versatility

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables simple, cost-effective, and versatile multi-directional movement for effective muscle training without the need for additional braking, allowing users to engage various muscle groups with ease.

Implementation Method 1

the dome structures are in contact with the multi-directional rotating members so as to cause a specified level of friction therebetween

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Data Source

PatentUS11857834B2Multi-directional workout wheel device
Publication Date: 2024.01.02 CHIN CHANG IND CO LTD
  • US11857834B2 patent drawing
  • US11857834B2 patent drawing
  • US11857834B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A workout device includes a base frame, a top cover and a gliding mechanism. The base frame includes a chassis and through holes formed in the chassis. The top cover includes dome structures aligned with the through holes, respectively, when the top cover is assembled to the base frame. The gliding mechanism consists of multi-directional rotating members accommodated in the dome structures and partially protruding from the through holes, respectively, when the top cover is assembled to the base frame. In response to a pressing force exerted onto the cover body, the dome structures are in contact with the multi-directional rotating members so as to cause friction therebetween, and the friction changes with the force exerted onto the cover body.