Workpiece Clamp Safety Device Prevents Accidental Unlocking

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing workpiece clamps lack operational safety and user-friendliness, particularly in preventing accidental unlocking of the locking device, which can lead to finger crushing injuries due to inadequate gap control between clamping surfaces.

Innovation Solution

A workpiece clamp with a safety device that prevents undesired unlocking of the locking device, featuring a safety element that can be fixed in a safety position and an actuating element allowing tool-free operation, enabling easy adjustment of the clamping surfaces while ensuring the locking device remains secured.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a locking device is used to maintain the maximum distance between clamping surfaces, then the gap control is improved, but the risk of accidental unlocking and finger crushing injuries increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegap controlVSAvoidfinger crushing risk
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The safety element is designed to preemptively prevent accidental unlocking by requiring a specific unlocking sequence. The safety element must first be actuated (rotated or pressed) before the locking device can be unlocked, creating a preliminary barrier against unintended unlocking actions that could cause finger crushing injuries.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

Solution Approach 2:

The safety element acts as an intermediary component between the operator and the locking device. It mediates the unlocking process by requiring deliberate activation through the actuating element, thereby preventing direct and potentially accidental unlocking of the locking device that maintains the gap between clamping surfaces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If a safety device is added to prevent accidental unlocking, then operational safety is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational safetyVSAvoidsafety device structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The safety element is merged with the locking device assembly, sharing common structural elements and mounting points. The safety element integrates with the actuating element and locking mechanism in a compact arrangement, reducing overall device complexity while maintaining operational safety functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The actuating element serves multiple functions: it actsuates the safety element to enable unlocking, and simultaneously provides a user-friendly interface for operators. The safety element itself serves both as a mechanical barrier against accidental unlocking and as part of the overall locking device structure, reducing the need for separate dedicated safety components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Reliability

If the locking device is made secure against unintended unlocking, then safety is improved, but ease of operation deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelocking securityVSAvoidunlocking operation
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The actuating element is designed to be self-explanatory and self-sufficient for the unlocking operation. It provides a clear mechanical interface that operators can intuitively understand and operate without requiring tools or complex procedures, while still maintaining secure locking through the safety element mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The actuating element changes the operational parameters by providing a lever arm that is at least ten times larger than the securing element's radius. This parameter change allows operators to apply sufficient force easily to actuate the safety element and unlock the locking device, maintaining ease of operation despite the added safety mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Ease of operation

If a lever arm with large radius is provided for manual operation, then ease of operation is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanual actuationVSAvoidactuating element structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The actuating element is segmented into functional zones: a large-radius lever arm portion for operator force application, and a smaller-radius securing element portion for engaging the locking mechanism. This segmentation allows the large lever arm to provide mechanical advantage for easy operation while the smaller securing element maintains compact integration with the locking device, minimizing overall structural complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution significantly enhances operational safety and user-friendliness by preventing accidental unlocking and allowing easy adjustment of the clamping surfaces, reducing the risk of injury and improving overall reliability.

Implementation Method 1

the actuating element has at least one load application point for an operator whose lever arm is at least ten times larger than a lever arm, in particular a radius, of the securing element

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLever: Lever

Data Source

PatentEP3593946B1Workpiece tensioner, processing device and clamping method
Publication Date: 2021.10.06 HOMAG GMBH
  • EP3593946B1 patent drawingFigure 1

AI summary

A workpiece clamp (1) for clamping workpieces, which preferably consist at least partially of wood, wood-based materials, plastic or the like, comprising: a first clamping element (2) and a second clamping element (4), each having a clamping surface (2', 4') for clamping a workpiece between the clamping surfaces, wherein the first and the second clamping element (2', 4') are movable relative to each other between a clamping position and an open position, and a locking device (10) that defines the maximum distance between the clamping surfaces (2', 4'), wherein the locking device (10) is unlockable to adjust the maximum distance between the clamping surfaces (2', 4'), characterized in that the workpiece clamp has a safety device (20) which is configured to prevent an unintentional unlocking of the locking device (10).