Workpiece Model Correction Learning for Precision Machining

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing machine learning technologies for robot operations struggle to accurately correct workpiece models to match target shapes, leading to errors in machining processes, requiring manual intervention and inefficient error reduction.

Innovation Solution

A machine learning apparatus that observes machining state data and error measurements to learn an optimal correction amount for workpiece models, using state variables to automatically determine the necessary adjustments, simplifying the correction process and improving precision through automated learning.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If manual methods are used to determine correction amounts, then flexibility in handling various machining conditions can be maintained, but the process becomes time-consuming and inefficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecorrection determination speedVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-learning by automatically observing machining states and measurement results, then autonomously determining correction amounts without requiring manual intervention. The learning section accumulates data and generates correction amounts independently, enabling the system to serve itself in the correction determination process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual mechanical correction determination with an automated learning-based system. The learning section uses accumulated machining state data and measurement results to automatically calculate correction amounts, substituting human operators and manual processes with an intelligent automated system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Ease of operation

If correction amounts are determined manually under various machining conditions, then adaptability to different conditions can be achieved, but the task becomes extremely complex and time-consuming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecorrection determination easeVSAvoidcorrection determination time
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary learning by accumulating machining state data and measurement results in advance. The learning section builds a knowledge base from historical data, enabling quick correction determination when actual machining occurs. This preliminary data accumulation and learning process eliminates the need for time-consuming manual analysis during production.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback by using measurement results of machining errors to continuously improve correction amounts. The learning section analyzes the relationship between machining states, measurement outcomes, and correction effectiveness, automatically adjusting and optimizing correction strategies based on accumulated feedback from actual machining operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Manufacturing precision

If learning is performed based on a huge data set, then high precision correction can be achieved, but data processing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveworkpiece shape precisionVSAvoiddata processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the huge data set into structured components including machining state data, measurement results, and correction amounts. The learning section processes this segmented data systematically, organizing it into manageable categories that can be analyzed efficiently. This segmentation enables high-precision learning without overwhelming the processing system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS12165078B2Machine learning apparatus, control device, machining system, and machine learning method for learning correction amount of workpiece model
Publication Date: 2024.12.10 FANUC LTD
  • US12165078B2 patent drawing
  • US12165078B2 patent drawing
  • US12165078B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A machine learning apparatus capable of reducing an error between a machined workpiece and a target shape when the workpiece is machined based on a workpiece model modeling the target shape of the workpiece. A machine learning apparatus includes a state observation section configured to observe machining state data of a machine tool configured to machine the workpiece, and measurement data of an error between a shape of the workpiece machined by the machine tool based on the workpiece model and the target shape, as a state variable representing a current state of environment in which the workpiece is machined, and a learning section configured to learn the correction amount in association with the error by using the state variable.