Machine Tool Workpiece Positioning by Fluid-Force Sensing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for calibrating workpieces with varying dimensions, such as cast workpieces, are complex and require manual intervention for accurate positioning and measurement, which complicates the definition of a zero point on a machine tool.

Innovation Solution

A method utilizing changes in the flow field between a tool and a workpiece due to relative movement, especially rotational components, to detect the distance between them by measuring the resulting force changes, which are then compensated by the machine tool's control system, potentially aided by machine learning for precision.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If manual calibration with a probe is used to determine workpiece position, then measurement accuracy is improved, but device complexity and operation time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveworkpiece position measurement accuracyVSAvoidcalibration process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical probe-based measurement system with a fluid dynamic system. A jet of fluid (liquid or gas) is directed at the workpiece surface, and the force exerted by the fluid jet on the workpiece is measured using a force sensor. This substitution eliminates the need for manual probe operation and complex coordinate system calculations, automatically determining workpiece position through force measurement while maintaining high precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables automatic workpiece positioning through self-service calibration. The control unit automatically processes the force measurement data from the fluid jet interaction, calculates the workpiece position and orientation, and defines the zero point without requiring manual intervention. This self-service approach significantly reduces operation time and simplifies the calibration process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Measurement precision

If manual probe calibration is performed to define zero point, then positioning accuracy is improved, but productivity decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvezero point definition accuracyVSAvoidmachining efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The mechanical probe calibration process is replaced with an automated fluid jet-based force measurement system. The fluid jet interacts with the workpiece surface, and the resulting force is measured and processed by a control unit to automatically determine the zero point and workpiece coordinates. This eliminates time-consuming manual operations while maintaining positioning accuracy, thereby improving productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary automatic calibration before machining begins. The fluid jet force measurement and zero point definition are completed automatically in advance, preparing the machine tool for immediate machining operations without requiring subsequent manual adjustments or measurements during the machining process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Measurement precision

If complex manual calibration procedures are used, then measurement accuracy is improved, but loss of time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveworkpiece coordinate determination accuracyVSAvoidcalibration time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The time-consuming manual probe measurement process is replaced with a rapid fluid jet force measurement system. The fluid jet can be quickly directed at different points on the workpiece surface, and the force sensor provides immediate measurements. The control unit rapidly processes this data to determine workpiece coordinates, significantly reducing calibration time while maintaining measurement precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The calibration process continues without interruption through automated fluid jet scanning. The control unit systematically directs the fluid jet across the workpiece surface in a continuous manner, collecting force measurement data without the start-stop manual operations required by probe methods. This continuous action eliminates idle time and accelerates the calibration process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Simplifies the calibration process by automating the determination of the workpiece's position, reducing manual intervention and enhancing precision through force detection and compensation, thereby improving machining efficiency and reducing rework.

Implementation Method 1

A jet of fluid is directed at a surface of the workpiece WS facing the tool WZ, and a change in the force exerted by the jet of fluid on the surface of the workpiece WS is detected

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFluid jet force: Pressure Increase

Data Source

PatentEP4582216A1Method for determining the position of a workpiece clamped in a machine tool and measuring device for carrying out said method
Publication Date: 2025.07.09 PRO2FUTURE GMBH
  • EP4582216A1 patent drawingFigure 1a~1b
  • EP4582216A1 patent drawingFigure 2~3
  • EP4582216A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention relates to a method and a measuring device for determining the position of a workpiece clamped in a machine tool, wherein the machine tool comprises a rotating tool and the workpiece and tool are surrounded by a fluid in which a flow field develops due to the rotation of the tool, wherein the force (Fx, Fy) acting on the tool (WZ) and the torque (MR) are determined by the fluid and the distance between the tool (WZ) and the surface of the workpiece (WS) facing the tool is determined from the change in the force and the torque.