Workpiece Support Device With Movable Flanges And Jaws

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing workpiece holding devices are inadequate for machining thin parts, as they often deform under pressure, and struggle with maintaining small, trimmed parts during machining operations, leading to costly and time-consuming manual or robotic handling.

Innovation Solution

A workpiece support device featuring movable flanges that press against the upper face and adjustable jaws that hold the part by its side faces, allowing for effective flattening and machining of contoured portions, with pneumatic actuation for precise control and independent operation of flanges and jaws.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Force

If thick parts are held by a vice or mandrel pressing on external side faces, then holding force is sufficient, but thin parts are deformed by the strong pressure

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveholding forceVSAvoidpart shape
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSShape

Solution Approach 1:

The invention transitions from vertical pressing (single dimension) to horizontal clamping (another dimension). Movable jaws move in a horizontal plane parallel to the support surface, clamping the part from the sides rather than pressing from above, thus providing holding force without deforming thin parts

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The holding function is segmented into two independent systems: flanges for applying vertical pressing force and movable jaws for applying horizontal clamping force. This allows each system to be optimized for its specific function - flanges for flattening and jaws for secure holding without deformation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Shape

If flanges press the part against the support surface, then flattening is achieved, but small trimmed parts cannot be maintained after separation

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveflatnessVSAvoidpart retention
Core Design Contradiction:
ShapeVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The jaws are made movable in a horizontal plane, allowing them to dynamically adjust and maintain contact with the part during machining operations. This dynamic clamping ensures that small trimmed parts remain securely held even after separation from the main workpiece

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The invention merges two holding mechanisms - flanges for flattening and movable jaws for retention - into a single integrated device. Both systems work simultaneously to provide comprehensive holding capability that addresses both flattening and retention requirements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Ease of operation

If manual or robotic handling is used to transfer contoured parts between machines, then part positioning is achieved, but processing time and costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepart handlingVSAvoidmachining efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The device provides universal holding capability that can accommodate various part geometries and machining operations within a single machine. The movable jaws can adapt to different part shapes and positions, eliminating the need for multiple specialized fixtures or manual transfer operations between different machines

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentEP1918066B1Part supporting device
Publication Date: 2009.05.06 YERLY MICHEL
  • EP1918066B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP1918066B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP1918066B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4

AI summary

The device has a support surface (2), and mobile clamping plates (5) for plating a piece on the support surface when the plates are supported against an upper side of the piece. The plates are raised during the insertion and removal of the piece. Mobile clamping jaws (3) are provided in a plane parallel to the support surface to maintain an inner portion (11) of the piece through its lateral sides. The plates are actuated independent of the jaws using a pneumatic system e.g. pneumatic piston, where the jaws are supported on a portion of an opening of the piece. An independent claim is also included for a method for machining a piece.