Worksite Charger Layout Optimization for Electrified Machine Scheduling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The introduction of electrified machines at worksites leads to issues such as reduced productivity, increased energy demand, poor scheduling, and higher costs due to suboptimal placement of chargers, which are not adjusted based on the worksite layout.

Innovation Solution

A method and system for optimizing charger locations using a distributed controller to calculate worksite metrics, scores, and select charging locations based on historical data and real-time factors, transmitting signals to machines and chargers to improve efficiency and reduce energy consumption.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If chargers are placed at fixed locations without optimization, then device complexity is reduced, but productivity decreases and energy demand increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveworksite productivityVSAvoidcharger placement system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The charger placement system transitions from static to dynamic by continuously calculating optimal charger locations based on real-time worksite metrics, machine locations, and historical data. The distributed controller updates charger positions dynamically to adapt to changing worksite conditions, thereby improving productivity without requiring overly complex manual reconfiguration processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback mechanisms by calculating worksite metrics based on historical data and real-time information, then using these metrics to determine optimal charger placements. The system continuously monitors productivity, energy consumption, and machine locations, feeding this information back into the optimization algorithm to improve charger positioning over time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Loss of energy

If charger locations are optimized dynamically, then energy demand is reduced, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy demand at worksiteVSAvoiddistributed controller system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system is segmented into a distributed controller architecture where multiple controllers operate independently at different worksite locations. Each controller manages local charger optimization based on regional metrics, reducing the computational burden and complexity of a centralized system while still achieving overall energy efficiency through localized optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables chargers and machines to self-optimize their positioning and charging schedules based on pre-calculated worksite metrics and historical patterns. The distributed controller provides the optimization framework, but the actual charging decisions and location adjustments are made autonomously by the machines and chargers themselves, reducing the operational complexity of the overall system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Productivity

If charger placement is optimized based on historical metrics, then cost is reduced, but measurement precision requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveworksite efficiencyVSAvoidworksite metric calculation precision
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system calculates worksite metrics with higher precision than strictly necessary for basic operation, using comprehensive historical data and multiple measurement parameters. This excessive measurement precision ensures that even under varying worksite conditions, the optimization decisions remain accurate and reliable, ultimately reducing costs through improved efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS20250279672A1Systems and methods for worksite geographic optimization
Publication Date: 2025.09.04 CATERPILLAR INC
  • US20250279672A1 patent drawing
  • US20250279672A1 patent drawing
  • US20250279672A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for worksite geographic optimization may include one or more processors configured to calculate a worksite metric for a first worksite layout, the worksite metric based on a worksite cost and a historic worksite metric during a previous time period. In some embodiments, the first worksite layout differs from a second worksite layout. The processor(s) calculate a score corresponding to a machine at the first worksite layout, and select a charging location for the machine at the first worksite layout, according to the score and the worksite metric. The processor(s) can transmit a first signal corresponding to the charging location to the first machine, and a second signal to a charger of the plurality of chargers at the charging location.