Workspace Instantiation Through Continuous Vulnerability Feedback

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing Information Handling Systems (IHSs) face challenges in securing workspaces due to varying operational scenarios and potential vulnerabilities, especially when used in diverse locations and coupled with both public and private devices, making them susceptible to malicious attacks.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a workspace orchestration service that uses continuous vulnerability intelligence feedback loops to scan, analyze, and generate models for securing workspaces, adjusting definitions based on threat patterns and vulnerabilities, and extending these models to other IHSs to ensure consistent security across multiple devices.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If workspace orchestration service continuously scans and analyzes vulnerabilities to generate updated protection models, then security protection capability is improved, but system complexity and computational resources increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity protection capabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary vulnerability scanning and analysis during workspace definition creation, establishing baseline protection models before actual threats materialize. This proactive approach allows the system to prepare security configurations in advance, reducing the complexity of real-time response while maintaining high security protection capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The workspace orchestration service implements continuous feedback loops where vulnerability scanning results, threat intelligence, and security events are fed back into the system to automatically update protection models. This automated feedback mechanism enables the system to adapt to new threats without manual intervention, improving security while managing complexity through automation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Adaptability or versatility

If the workspace orchestration service dynamically adjusts protection models based on threat patterns, then adaptability to changing threats is improved, but processing time and computational resources increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to changing threatsVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system pre-processes and categorizes threat patterns, establishing baseline protection models that can be quickly activated when threats are detected. By preparing response templates and protection configurations in advance, the system can dynamically adapt to new threats without requiring extensive real-time processing, thus maintaining low latency while achieving high adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The workspace orchestration service dynamically adjusts protection parameters such as security policies, access controls, and isolation levels based on detected threat patterns. By changing only the necessary parameters rather than reconfiguring entire protection models, the system achieves rapid adaptation to changing threats while minimizing processing time and computational overhead.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If vulnerability scanning and threat analysis are performed continuously, then detection precision of security threats is improved, but system performance and resource consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection precisionVSAvoidsystem performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The workspace orchestration service implements periodic vulnerability scanning and threat analysis at strategically determined intervals rather than continuous monitoring. Scanning frequency is adjusted based on risk levels, change detection, and threat intelligence, allowing the system to maintain high detection precision for critical issues while reducing unnecessary scanning that would degrade system performance and consume excessive resources.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies different scanning depths and analysis intensities to different workspaces based on their sensitivity, criticality, and risk profiles. High-value targets receive more intensive and frequent scanning with higher detection precision, while lower-risk workspaces receive lighter scanning to minimize performance impact. This localized quality approach optimizes the balance between detection precision and system performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS12430444B2Workspace instantiation using continuous vulnerability intelligence feedback loops
Publication Date: 2025.09.30 DELL PROD LP
  • US12430444B2 patent drawing
  • US12430444B2 patent drawing
  • US12430444B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An Information Technology Decision Maker (ITDM) defines a user workspace to be received and orchestrated by a workspace orchestration Information Handling System (IHS) on a host IHS. The orchestration IHS also receives specifications of the host, scans the user workspace definition for vulnerabilities, analyzes the vulnerabilities, and generates (an) attack parameter(s) and/or (a) pattern(s) of threat(s) to the user workspace. The orchestration IHS defines a model workspace definition that includes baseline protection for workload deployment against the attack parameter(s) and/or pattern(s) of threat(s), for orchestration, with the host, on the host. The same or another orchestration IHS (local to the host IHS) traces drift in the workload on the host, generates further attack parameter(s) and/or further pattern(s) of threat(s) from the drift. The same or other orchestration IHS adjusts the model workspace definition to include protection against the further attack parameter(s) and/or further pattern(s) of threat(s), for orchestration.