Peripheral Workspace Node Ranking for Firmware Update Ownership

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The challenge of efficiently managing firmware updates and configuration policies across multiple peripheral devices in a workspace, particularly in hybrid work scenarios where users frequently switch between different device configurations, leading to tedious manual reconfiguration and inconsistency.

Innovation Solution

An adaptive system that dynamically assigns firmware update and configuration policy execution based on real-time assessments of node capabilities and workloads, using an ecosystem manageability sub-agent and a cloud orchestrator to rank and delegate tasks to the most capable and underutilized nodes within the workspace.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual reconfiguration is performed for each device switch, then configuration consistency can be maintained, but user time and operational complexity increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconfiguration consistencyVSAvoidreconfiguration time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically detects device changes and applies appropriate configuration policies without user intervention. The cloud orchestrator continuously monitors the workspace environment, identifies when devices are added or removed, and autonomously reconfigures the workspace according to stored policies, making the system self-serve its own configuration needs

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

Configuration policies are pre-defined and stored in the cloud orchestrator before device changes occur. When a device is added or removed, the system retrieves and applies the appropriate pre-configured policy, eliminating the need for users to manually configure settings each time the workspace composition changes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Device complexity

If firmware updates are centralized on a single node, then update management is simplified, but system reliability decreases due to single point of failure

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveupdate management complexityVSAvoidupdate system reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The firmware update management function is segmented and distributed across multiple capable nodes in the workspace rather than centralized on a single node. Each node that meets the capability criteria can serve as an update source, dividing the update management responsibility across multiple independent units to eliminate single points of failure

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically changes the operational parameters of different nodes based on their current state. Nodes that are underutilized or have available resources are assigned additional roles such as firmware storage or update execution, allowing the update management capability to be flexibly distributed across nodes whose parameters (resource availability, workload) change over time

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If all nodes are utilized for firmware updates, then update speed increases, but node overload and system instability occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveupdate speedVSAvoidsystem stability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts which nodes participate in firmware updates based on real-time monitoring of node workload, resource availability, and operational state. The set of active update nodes is not fixed but changes dynamically as nodes become available or become overloaded, allowing the system to optimize update speed while preventing any single node from being overutilized

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

Rather than requiring all nodes to participate in firmware updates, the system uses a subset of nodes that are currently capable and underutilized. This partial action approach ensures that update operations are performed by enough nodes to maintain productivity while leaving other nodes available for their primary functions, thus preventing system-wide instability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

4Measurement precision

If capability assessment is performed continuously, then node selection accuracy improves, but system overhead and energy consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenode capability assessment accuracyVSAvoidassessment energy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs capability and workload assessments at periodic intervals rather than continuously. The cloud orchestrator schedules regular status checks of nodes in the workspace, retrieving updated information about resource availability and operational state at defined time intervals, which reduces energy consumption while maintaining sufficiently accurate node selection for firmware updates

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Data Source

PatentUS12517845B2System and method for adaptive configuration and firmware update ownership across nodes of a peripheral device workspace based on real-time assessment of node capabilities and capacity
Publication Date: 2026.01.06 DELL PROD LP
  • US12517845B2 patent drawing
  • US12517845B2 patent drawing
  • US12517845B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A peripheral device workspace cloud orchestrator information handling system comprises a network interface device to receive maximum and current hardware resource availabilities and for a first anchor information handling system node and other peripheral device nodes operatively coupled at an identified location to form a defined peripheral device workspace that also includes a second information handling system node or a smart peripheral device node, and a hardware processor to execute code instructions to determine a ranking score for the first and second information handling systems, and smart peripheral device, based on the maximum and current hardware resource availabilities to determine which one of the second information handling system or the smart peripheral device associated with a highest ranking score is to transition to implement transmitted peripheral device operational configuration policies or firmware or software updates at each of the plurality of peripheral devices.