Adaptive Workspace Environmental Control Using Psychological Feedback

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing techniques for environmental control in workspaces struggle to efficiently determine stimuli that optimize concentration or creativity for individual users, as they lack the ability to adapt based on real-time psychological changes and require extensive historical data accumulation.

Innovation Solution

An information processing method that derives a psychological score for users, applies initial environmental controls based on similar attributes, and adjusts these controls if the score doesn't increase, switching to alternative controls with proven effectiveness for similar users, utilizing sensors and environment-forming apparatus to optimize sensory stimuli.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If environmental control is determined based on extensive historical data accumulation, then personalization accuracy is improved, but time consumption and system complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepersonalization accuracyVSAvoidtime consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system pre-calculates and stores environmental control contents that are likely to increase psychological scores for different user attributes before users arrive. When a user enters, the system quickly retrieves pre-prepared control contents based on the user's attributes and initial psychological score, avoiding the need to accumulate and analyze extensive historical data in real-time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts environmental control contents based on real-time psychological score changes. If the psychological score increases after executing a control content, the system learns and updates the mapping between user attributes and effective control contents. This dynamic adaptation enables continuous improvement of personalization accuracy without requiring extensive historical data accumulation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Adaptability or versatility

If environmental control is adjusted based on real-time psychological score changes, then adaptability to individual users is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to individual usersVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements a feedback mechanism where the psychological score before and after environmental control execution is compared. Based on whether the score increases or decreases, the system adjusts future control content selections for the same user. This simple feedback loop enables real-time adaptation to individual user responses without requiring complex algorithms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system automatically adjusts environmental control contents based on observed psychological score changes without requiring manual intervention or complex configuration. The system self-learns which control contents are effective for each user by monitoring score changes, reducing the need for complex system management while maintaining high adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Measurement precision

If multiple environmental control contents are tested to find the most effective one, then personalization accuracy is improved, but productivity and efficiency decrease

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepersonalization accuracyVSAvoidefficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system executes environmental control contents in sequence based on predicted effectiveness rather than testing all possible control contents. By partially testing control contents in a predetermined order based on user attributes and initial psychological scores, the system achieves sufficient personalization accuracy without the inefficiency of exhaustive testing of all options.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS20260018273A1Information processing method and information processing system
Publication Date: 2026.01.15 PANASONIC INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT CO LTD
  • US20260018273A1 patent drawing
  • US20260018273A1 patent drawing
  • US20260018273A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An information processing system executes, on a first user, a first environmental control previously performed on users with attributes similar to attributes of the first user; determines whether a psychological score of the first user has increased as a result of the first environmental control; and determines, if it is determined that the psychological score has not increased, a second environmental control different from the first environmental control as the next environmental control to be executed on the first user. The second environmental control is an environmental control that was previously performed on users with attributes similar to attributes of the first user and can contribute to an increased psychological score.