Worm Drive Locking Device Resolving Preload and Complexity

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Electromechanical drop-bolts often fail to retract due to 'preload' conditions, such as sideways pressure or air pressure differences, leading to locking device failure and complexity in construction with many moving parts, which increases manufacturing costs and vulnerability to tampering.

Innovation Solution

A rotary motor-driven worm drive mechanism with a pivotally mounted bolt, return spring, and microswitches that resist forces parallel to the gear's axis of rotation, ensuring the bolt can be reliably extended and retracted, and an onboard power storage system for fail-safe operation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a roller nut and screw shaft mechanism is used to overcome preload, then the bolt can be rotated to extended position, but the device complexity increases and manufacturing cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebolt extension reliabilityVSAvoidnumber of moving parts
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention extracts and eliminates the roller nut and screw shaft components from the system, replacing them with a direct motor-to-gear connection. This removal of unnecessary components reduces the number of moving parts while maintaining the bolt extension function through a simplified direct-drive mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of using a complex roller nut-screw shaft mechanism to achieve bolt rotation, the invention inverts the approach by using a simple geared motor system where the motor directly drives the bolt through gears. This inversion simplifies the mechanical transmission path while achieving the same functional outcome.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

2Reliability

If more moving parts are added to overcome preload, then the locking function can be improved, but the vulnerability to tampering increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelocking functionVSAvoidvulnerability to tampering
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The invention removes multiple moving parts that create vulnerability points for tampering. By extracting the roller nut, screw shaft, and other intermediate components, the system achieves its locking function with fewer exposure points that intruders could potentially exploit.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes the fundamental parameter of mechanical transmission from a multi-component system to a direct-drive geared system. This parameter change reduces the number of interfaces and moving parts that could be targeted for tampering while maintaining secure locking functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Force

If a complex mechanism with many parts is used, then preload resistance can be improved, but the manufacturing cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepreload resistanceVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The invention extracts the complex roller nut and screw shaft assembly and replaces it with a simple geared motor system. This extraction eliminates the need for precision-machined threaded components and complex assemblies, significantly reducing manufacturing complexity and cost while maintaining adequate preload resistance through the direct-drive mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of building up complexity with multiple components to achieve preload resistance, the invention inverts the approach by using a simplified direct-drive system. The motor's inherent torque characteristics combined with the gear reduction provide sufficient force to overcome preload conditions without requiring complex mechanical assemblies.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution provides a simplified locking device with improved preload resistance, tolerance for door misalignment, and reliable fail-safe operation, reducing manufacturing costs and enhancing security by minimizing moving parts and ensuring the lock remains secure even without continuous power.

Implementation Method 1

a return spring for moving the bolt from the extended to the retracted position

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElastic potential energy: Spring

Implementation Method 2

a worm drive arrangement including a worm and a gear; and a pivotally mounted bolt which is rotatable between a retracted position and an extended position

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectWorm drive: Worm Drive

Data Source

PatentEP2710208B1A locking device
Publication Date: 2019.11.27 FIRE & SECURITY HARDWARE
  • EP2710208B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2710208B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2710208B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A locking device is described including: a rotary motor; a worm drive arrangement including a worm and a gear; and a pivotally mounted bolt which is rotatable between a retracted position and an extended position; the motor is arranged to drive the worm to rotate the gear; as the gear rotates it cooperates with a cam formation associated with the bolt to move the bolt between the retracted and extended positions.