Wound Drainage Test Unit Simulating Suction Pressure

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

It is challenging to determine the optimal wound drainage dressing and suction pressure for various wounds, as existing technologies lack a standardized method for testing and evaluating the performance of wound drainage dressings under practical conditions.

Innovation Solution

A test unit is developed that simulates a wound environment by using a main body with cavities and channels to mimic the wound bed, allowing for the application and testing of different wound drainage dressings with various suction pressures and liquids, while enabling the measurement of fluid uptake and flow rates, and accommodating different suction pumps and wound covers.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If a standardized test method is implemented, then measurement precision and reliability are improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetesting uniformityVSAvoidtest unit structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The test unit creates a simplified copy of the actual wound environment using cavities to simulate the wound bed and channels to simulate pores in the wound floor. This copying approach enables standardized testing without requiring actual wound samples, thereby improving measurement precision while keeping the device structure manageable through abstraction of essential features only.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The test unit allows systematic variation of key parameters including vacuum pressure levels, liquid composition and flow rates, and dressing configurations. By enabling controlled parameter changes, the device achieves high measurement precision for evaluating dressing performance under different conditions without requiring overly complex hardware.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Adaptability or versatility

If realistic wound simulation is achieved, then adaptability to real-world conditions is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereal-world condition simulationVSAvoidtest system configuration
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The test unit is divided into distinct functional segments: cavities for simulating the wound bed, channels for simulating pores, supply lines for liquid introduction, and vacuum connections for applying suction. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized independently for its specific function while maintaining overall adaptability to real-world conditions without excessive complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The test unit is designed as a universal platform that can evaluate different types of wound drainage dressings, accommodate various liquid compositions, and test multiple vacuum pressure levels. The standardized cavity and channel configurations enable broad adaptability across different testing scenarios while using a single reusable device structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Loss of information

If comprehensive testing data is collected, then information completeness is improved, but loss of time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveperformance data completenessVSAvoidtesting duration
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The test unit enables continuous collection of performance data by maintaining steady vacuum pressure and continuous liquid flow through the dressing sample. This continuous operation allows comprehensive data collection on fluid uptake, flow rates, and pressure characteristics without requiring multiple separate test runs, thereby reducing total testing time while maintaining information completeness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Solution Approach 2:

The test system incorporates measurement capabilities that provide real-time feedback on liquid flow rates, vacuum pressure levels, and dressing saturation. This feedback mechanism allows for immediate detection of performance parameters and enables rapid adjustment of test conditions, reducing the time required to gather comprehensive performance data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This test unit facilitates uniform and optimized testing of wound drainage dressings, aiding in their development and usage, as well as the evaluation of new suction pumps and drainage methods, by simulating real-world conditions and providing comprehensive data on performance and behavior.

Implementation Method 1

a vacuum can be generated in the cavity and the channels when the support surface is covered in an airtight manner

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVacuum: Vacuum

Implementation Method 2

A drainage tube is inserted into the wound space from the outside and is connected to a suction pump in order to suck wound secretions out of the wound

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSuction: Suction

Implementation Method 3

This foam insert can at the same time serve as an absorption body for the wound secretions

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAbsorption: Absorption (physical)

Implementation Method 4

a wound dressing is placed on the wound. This wound dressing is usually composed of a foam insert with suitably configured pores

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCapillary action: Capillary Action

Data Source

PatentUS8647327B2Test unit for wound drainage dressings
Publication Date: 2014.02.11 MEDAXIS
  • US8647327B2 patent drawing
  • US8647327B2 patent drawing
  • US8647327B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention relates to a test unit for wound drainage coverings comprising: a base body with at least one cavity; at least one supply line that runs through the base body and which connects an outer side of the base body to the cavity; a surface of the base body that is embodied as a support surface for supporting wound coverings and the wound drainage coverings thereof and several channels that run through the base body, the channels connecting the cavities to the support surface. Low pressure can be produced in the cavity and the channels when the support surface is covered in an air-tight manner. As a result, wound drainage applications are tested in different ways using simple and economical means.