Magnetic Writer Offset Error Correction in Shingled Track Storage

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Magnetic tape storage systems face challenges in increasing data density and maintaining readback performance due to discrepancies between nominal and actual writer characteristics, leading to track misplacement and increased readback errors from side-writing effects.

Innovation Solution

A method is introduced to determine a lateral writing position by analyzing readback errors across different reader offsets, allowing for accurate alignment of shingled tracks and reducing misregistration by computing a lateral offset to compensate for actual writer characteristics, thereby improving track placement and readback reliability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If shingled tracks are written using an array of writers with nominal characteristics, then data storage density is increased, but actual track placement deviates from specified locations due to writer offset errors

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata storage densityVSAvoidtrack placement accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary characterization of each writer's actual writing position by writing test tracks and measuring their locations. This preliminary information is stored and used to compute offset corrections before actual data writing, allowing the system to pre-compensate for writer variations and place tracks accurately according to the specified format

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the writing position parameter dynamically by applying computed lateral offsets to each writer based on its measured characteristics. This parameter adjustment ensures that despite manufacturing variations in writer positions, the actual track placement conforms to the specified format requirements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Ease of operation

If readers are positioned at nominal reading locations, then read operations are simplified, but readback performance deteriorates due to mismatch with actual track positions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveread operation simplicityVSAvoidreadback performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses feedback from measured track positions to adjust reading operations. By characterizing the actual writer positions and computing offsets, the system can compensate for mismatches during reading, maintaining high readback performance without requiring complex mechanical repositioning of readers

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates a digital model (copy) of the actual writer characteristics and uses this model to guide both writing and reading operations. This virtual representation allows the system to predict and compensate for position deviations without physical measurement during operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Manufacturing precision

If lateral writing position is adjusted to compensate for writer offset errors, then track placement accuracy is improved, but device complexity increases due to additional measurement and computation requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetrack placement accuracyVSAvoidmeasurement and computation system
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-characterization by writing test tracks and measuring their own output positions. Each drive automatically determines its writers' offset errors and computes correction values without external intervention, reducing the need for complex external measurement equipment and calibration procedures

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enhances data storage density and readback performance by ensuring shingled tracks are written in the correct position, reducing errors and improving interchangeability across different drives.

Implementation Method 1

The magnetic recording transducer then generates a magnetic field, which encodes the data into the magnetic media

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic induction: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 2

Data is read from the media by similarly positioning the magnetic read transducer and then sensing the magnetic field of the magnetic media

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic field sensing: Magnetic Field

Data Source

PatentUS10014019B2Measurement and correction of magnetic writer offset error
Publication Date: 2018.07.03 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION
  • US10014019B2 patent drawing
  • US10014019B2 patent drawing
  • US10014019B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method, according to one embodiment, includes writing a plurality of shingled tracks using an array of writers. The array of readers is repositioned to various locations between first and second positions and data is read from the shingled tracks at the various locations. A read offset point where read performance is about the highest during the reading performed when repositioning the array of readers between the first and second positions is determined. The method includes computing, using the read offset point, data describing a lateral writing position to use during writing such that shingled tracks are written in a location specified by a format. As a result, methods according to the present embodiment are able to provide desirable track alignment and reduced readback error rates for data of shingled tracks written to magnetic medium.