WTRU Delay Spread Measurement for Dynamic Cyclic Prefix Selection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing wireless communication systems face challenges in selecting appropriate cyclic prefix (CP) sizes to mitigate inter-symbol interference (ISI) due to varying delay spreads, leading to inefficient system overhead and potential signal decoding issues, especially in environments with reconfigurable intelligent surfaces (RIS) that introduce complex propagation paths.

Innovation Solution

Implement AI/ML operations for federated learning among WTRUs to dynamically determine and adjust CP sizes based on delay spread measurements using CSI-RS resources, enabling WTRUs to request CP size changes and report delay spread information to optimize communication performance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a larger cyclic prefix size is used to accommodate maximum delay spread, then signal decoding reliability is improved, but system overhead increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesignal decoding reliabilityVSAvoidsystem overhead
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic CP size selection where the WTRU measures delay spread and selects from multiple standardized CP sizes (e.g., 1/12, 1/24, 1/32 of OFDM symbol duration) based on the measured delay spread value. This dynamic adaptation allows the system to use larger CP sizes only when necessary, reducing overhead in environments with small delay spread while maintaining reliability when delay spread is large.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the CP size parameter dynamically based on measured delay spread characteristics. The WTRU reports delay spread measurements to the network, which then configures appropriate CP sizes for different transmission scenarios. This parameter adaptation resolves the contradiction by matching CP size to actual channel conditions rather than using a fixed conservative size.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Device complexity

If standardized CP sizes are used based on sub-carrier spacing mode, then device complexity is reduced, but adaptability to varying delay spreads deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveCP size configuration complexityVSAvoidadaptability to varying delay spreads
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the CP size configuration into multiple standardized options (e.g., first CP size, second CP size, third CP size corresponding to different sub-carrier spacing modes). Each size is pre-defined and standardized, which simplifies the WTRU's task while enabling adaptation through selection from these segmented options based on measured delay spread and network configuration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where the WTRU measures delay spread and reports this information to the network node. The network then uses this feedback to configure the appropriate CP size for the WTRU. This feedback loop enables adaptability to varying delay spreads while maintaining standardized CP size options, resolving the contradiction between simplicity and adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Loss of energy

If smaller cyclic prefix sizes are used for high sub-carrier spacing modes, then system overhead is reduced, but ability to mitigate inter-symbol interference deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem overheadVSAvoidinter-symbol interference mitigation
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent dynamically adjusts CP size based on the actual delay spread measurement and operational conditions. When operating with high sub-carrier spacing modes that inherently have smaller standard CP sizes, the system can still extend the CP size dynamically if delay spread measurements indicate the need for longer protection against ISI, thus resolving the overhead-reliability tradeoff.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the CP size parameter independently of the sub-carrier spacing mode by measuring actual delay spread conditions. This allows the system to use smaller CP sizes for high SCS modes when delay spread is small (reducing overhead) while switching to larger CP sizes when delay spread increases (improving ISI mitigation), thereby resolving the contradiction between overhead reduction and interference protection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20250240073A1Methods, apparatus, and systems for delay spread measurement, reporting, and cyclic prefix determination
Publication Date: 2025.07.24 INTERDIGITAL PATENT HOLDINGS INC
  • US20250240073A1 patent drawing
  • US20250240073A1 patent drawing
  • US20250240073A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A wireless transmit/receive unit (WTRU) may receive configuration information that indicates one or more of a first transmission configuration indicator (TCI) state, a second TCI state, a first cyclic prefix (CP) size, a first channel state information-reference signal (CSI-RS) resource set, and a second CSI-RS resource set. The WTRU may determine a first delay spread and a first measurement value associated with a first CSI-RS. The WTRU may determine a second delay spread and a second measurement value associated with a second CSI-RS. The WTRU may send a first indication indicating whether the first delay spread is greater than or less than the first CP size.